首页> 外文学位 >A climate-dependent comparative productivity study of communal and commercial livestock farming systems in Namaqualand South Africa.
【24h】

A climate-dependent comparative productivity study of communal and commercial livestock farming systems in Namaqualand South Africa.

机译:南非Namaqualand的公共和商业牲畜养殖系统的气候依赖性比较生产力研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A dual economy exists between commercial and communal livestock farming in the semi-desert succulent karoo agroecological zone (AEZ) of South Africa and Namibia. Individually owned commercial farms are interspersed with pockets of communally held reserves comprised of the former 'Coloured Rural Areas' (CRAs). Generally, communal areas stock sheep and goats at double the density of commercial farms, and thus have lower levels of vegetative cover on inherently more marginal land (fewer natural drainage areas, and more rocky or mountainous rangeland) compared to commercial farms. This study explores the relationship between Stocking Density (SD) and productivity to determine how close to an economic carrying capacity the two Livestock Farming Systems (LFS) are under Good, Average, and Poor (GAP) veld condition years as conceptualized by the farmer. To compare the relative efficiency and profitability of the two forms of livestock farming, total net returns, and net returns on a per animal and per hectare basis are calculated. The findings are related to the Quality of Life (QOL) found on these two LFS. Policy recommendations (on livestock management and land reform) aimed at improving welfare on communal farms are discussed. Finally, the study creates a typology of communal and commercial livestock farmers based on the survey responses of seven communal farmers and one neighboring commercial farmer.
机译:在南非和纳米比亚的半沙漠多肉卡鲁农业生态区(AEZ),商业和公共畜牧业之间存在双重经济。个体拥有的商业农场散布着由前“有色农村地区”(CRA)组成的一些公共储备区。通常,与商业农场相比,公共区域存储的绵羊和山羊的密度是商业农场密度的两倍,因此在本来就更多的边际土地(较少的自然流域,以及更多的岩石或山区牧场)上的植被覆盖水平较低。这项研究探索了种群密度(SD)与生产率之间的关系,以确定两个牲畜耕作系统(LFS)在该农民构想的良好,平均和较差(GAP)耕种条件年内接近经济承受能力的程度。为了比较两种形式的畜牧业的相对效率和获利能力,计算了总净收益以及每头动物和每公顷的净收益。这些发现与这两个LFS上的生活质量(QOL)有关。讨论了旨在改善公共农场福利的政策建议(关于牲畜管理和土地改革)。最后,该研究基于对七个公共农场主和一个邻近商业农场主的调查答复,创建了一个公共和商业牲畜农场主的类型。

著录项

  • 作者

    Solomon, Ayele.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan State University.;
  • 学科 Agriculture Animal Culture and Nutrition.;Agriculture Range Management.;Sociology Social Structure and Development.;Economics Agricultural.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 158 p.
  • 总页数 158
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号