首页> 外文学位 >Defining difference, defining moments: Competing moral discourses, constitutional options, and 'Indian' ethnic identities during the transition from apartheid to democracy in South Africa, 1990--1994.
【24h】

Defining difference, defining moments: Competing moral discourses, constitutional options, and 'Indian' ethnic identities during the transition from apartheid to democracy in South Africa, 1990--1994.

机译:定义差异,定义时刻:1990--1994年南非从种族隔离到民主过渡期间的竞争性道德话语,宪法选择和``印度''族裔身份。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study analyzes competing moral discourses and constitutional options during the period of political transition from apartheid to democracy in South Africa from 1990 to 1994 and, specifically, contested visions of the future just society and the place of Indian South Africans and other 'races' in such a society. Focusing on those people formerly classified by law in South Africa as 'Indian'---the descendants of migrants from South Asia---and their structurally mediating and politically ambivalent position in the wider South African society, the study explores the complex relationship between socio-legal 'race' classification and self-ascribed ethnic identity at a time of dramatic political, legal, and constitutional change. It examines the ways in which the apartheid state attempted to structure individual and group identity through 'multiracial' legal categories (Indian, African, White, Coloured) and 'moral' discourse, as well as how the imposition of a state-defined identity generated both accommodation and resistance, as manifested in competing classificatory discourses (nonracialism, multiracialism, Black Consciousness, Africanism) and contested identities. National events, processes, and discourses associated with the four-year political transition from apartheid to democracy provide the context within which the dissertation explores public (community) debate and private (domestic) discussion among Indian South Africans concerning their identity and future 'place' in an officially 'nonracial' yet fundamentally multicultural society. This public debate and private discussion, about issues of identity and the position of 'Indians' in a future democratic South Africa, demonstrated a strong sense of belonging to a transnational Indian diaspora. For Indian South Africans, once victims of apartheid and racial oppression as 'blacks' under white minority rule, yet at the same time acutely aware of the plight of diasporic 'Indians' elsewhere in Africa under black majority rule, such conjecture about the future was characterized by a complex mixture of hope and apprehension. The political ambivalence and structural ambiguity characterizing the identity and position of Indian South Africans during the transition from apartheid to democracy is articulated in the dissertation in terms of an understanding of socio-legal race classification and self-ascribed ethnic identity as theoretical issues.
机译:这项研究分析了1990年至1994年南非从种族隔离到民主的政治过渡时期内相互竞争的道德话语和宪法选项,尤其是对未来正义社会和印度南非人的地位以及其他“种族”的有争议的看法。这样的社会。该研究关注的是那些以前在南非被依法分类为“印度人”的人-来自南亚的移民后裔-以及他们在更广泛的南非社会中的结构性调解和政治上的矛盾立场,该研究探讨了两者之间的复杂关系在剧烈的政治,法律和宪法变革时期,社会法律的“种族”分类和自我赋予的种族身份。它研究了种族隔离国家试图通过“多种族”法律类别(印度,非洲,白人,有色)和“道德”话语来构造个人和群体身份的方式,以及如何施加国家定义的身份适应性和反抗性,在竞争性分类话语(非种族主义,多种族主义,黑人意识,非洲主义)和有争议的身份中表现出来。与从种族隔离到民主的四年政治过渡相关的国家事件,过程和话语提供了一个背景,在此背景下,论文探讨了印度南非人之间有关其身份和未来“位置”的公共(社区)辩论和私人(家庭)讨论在一个正式的“非种族”但从根本上说是多元文化的社会中。这场关于身份认同和“印第安人”在未来民主南非中的地位的问题的公开辩论和私人讨论,显示出强烈的对跨国印度侨民的归属感。对于印度裔南非人来说,曾经是种族隔离和种族压迫的受害者,因为他们是白人少数派统治下的“黑人”,但同时也清楚地意识到,在黑人多数派统治下非洲其他地方流散的“印第安人”的困境,对未来的这种猜想是充满希望和忧虑的复杂特征。本文从对社会法律族裔分类和自我赋予种族认同作为理论问题的理解出发,阐述了从种族隔离到民主过渡期间表征印度南非人身份和地位的政治歧义和结构歧义。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Anthropology Cultural.; History African.; Law.; Sociology Ethnic and Racial Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 557 p.
  • 总页数 557
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 人类学;非洲史;法律;民族学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号