首页> 外文学位 >Analysis of spatial yield variability and economics of prescriptions for precision agriculture: A crop modeling approach.
【24h】

Analysis of spatial yield variability and economics of prescriptions for precision agriculture: A crop modeling approach.

机译:精准农业处方的空间产量变异性和经济学分析:一种作物建模方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Non-uniformity of soil properties, soil moisture and rooting depth, and other factors such pest and disease pressures can cause significant soybean and corn yield variability within a field. In this study, two crop growth models were used to characterize factors that cause spatial yield variability in soybeans and corn, and to evaluate economic consequences of variable rate management prescriptions. Analysis of yield data from 224 grids within a 16-hectare field in Boone, Iowa focused on water stress effects using CROPGRO-Soybean and CERES-Maize models for soybean and corn, respectively. Water stress explained 69% of the variability in soybean, and population and water stress explained 57% of corn yield variability. Grid-level optimum nitrogen fertilizer rate prescriptions for corn were also developed. Distribution of optimum nitrogen fertilizer prescription was highly spatially varied. Optimum nitrogen rates were found to range from 141 to 160 kg ha−1 in 64 of 224 grids (28.6%) which are typical fertilizer rates farmers apply for corn in Iowa. Based on model predictions, grid-level nitrogen fertilizer management used lower amounts of nitrate, produced higher yields and was more profitable than either transect- or field-level (single rate) fertilizer application. In another study, four factors affecting soybean yield variability namely, water stress, soybean cyst nematode (SCN), soil pH, and weeds, were examined in each of 100 grids within a 20-hectare field in Perry, Iowa using the CROPGRO-Soybean model. Average estimated yield loss due to the combined effects of water stress, SCN, pH, and weeds in each 0.2-hectare grid was 842 kg ha−1. Water stress had the biggest impact on soybean yield with an average yield reduction of 626 kg ha−1. Yield impact and economic consequences of three strategies namely, variable plant population density (PPD), soybean cyst nematode (SCN) resistant and susceptible varieties, and irrigation management schemes, were evaluated using 34 years of weather data. Implementing the best PPD for each year produced higher grid-level soybean yield and net return compared to using the 34-year average optimum rate. Achieving maximum net return may not be possible on a yearly basis due to uncertainties in weather condition. Using a SCN-resistant variety resulted in significant yield increase over that of a susceptible variety. Several grids had a significant increase (>350 kg ha−1 ) in average yield with some grids having as much as 995 kg ha −1 (17 bu ac−1) yield increase when a SCN-resistant variety was used. Irrigating when available soil moisture reached a value of 40% and 50% significantly increased average field-level soybean yields by 1585 and 1619 kg ha−1, respectively. Excluding the cost of equipment, irrigation would significantly increase net return.
机译:土壤特性,土壤湿度和生根深度的不均匀性,以及病虫害和疾病压力等其他因素,可能会导致田间大豆和玉米的产量显着变化。在这项研究中,使用了两种作物生长模型来表征引起大豆和玉米空间单产变化的因素,并评估可变利率管理处方的经济后果。在爱荷华州Boone的一个16公顷田地中,通过224个网格的产量数据进行分析,分别使用CROPGRO-大豆模型和CERES-玉米模型对大豆和玉米进行了水分胁迫效应分析。水分胁迫解释了大豆中69%的变异性,人口和水分胁迫解释了玉米中57%的变异性。还开发了用于玉米的网格级最佳氮肥用量处方。最佳氮肥配方的分布在空间上变化很大。在224个网格中的64个网格(28.6%)中,最佳氮肥浓度范围为141至160 kg ha -1 ,这是爱荷华州农民申请玉米的典型肥料剂量。根据模型预测,网格水平的氮肥管理所使用的硝酸盐量较少,产量更高,并且与横断面或田间(单倍速)肥料相比,其利润更高。在另一项研究中,使用CROPGRO-大豆在爱荷华州佩里的20公顷田地中的100个网格中的每个网格中检查了影响大豆产量变异的四个因素,即水分胁迫,大豆孢囊线虫(SCN),土壤pH值和杂草。模型。在每个0.2公顷的网格中,由于水分胁迫,SCN,pH和杂草的综合影响,平均估计产量损失为842 kg ha -1 。水分胁迫对大豆产量的影响最大,平均减产626 kg ha -1 。使用34年的天气数据评估了三种策略的产量影响和经济后果,即可变植物种群密度(PPD),大豆囊虫线虫(SCN)抗性和易感品种以及灌溉管理方案。与使用34年平均最佳增长率相比,每年实施最佳PPD可以提高电网水平的大豆单产和净收益。由于天气状况的不确定性,可能无法每年实现最大净回报。使用抗SCN的品种比易感品种的产量显着提高。几个栅格的平均单产显着提高(> 350 kg ha -1 ),而有些栅格的最大产量高达995 kg ha -1 (17 bu ac 当使用抗SCN的品种时,产量提高-1)。当有效土壤水分达到40%和50%时进行灌溉,分别使田间平均大豆单产分别提高1585和1619 kg ha -1 。排除设备成本,灌溉将显着增加净收益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Paz, Joel Obien.;

  • 作者单位

    Iowa State University.;

  • 授予单位 Iowa State University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Agricultural.; Agriculture Agronomy.; Economics Agricultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 104 p.
  • 总页数 104
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农业工程;农学(农艺学);农业经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号