首页> 外文学位 >Labor, the state, and ethnic conflict: A comparative study of British rule in Palestine (1920--1939) and Northern Ireland (1972--1994).
【24h】

Labor, the state, and ethnic conflict: A comparative study of British rule in Palestine (1920--1939) and Northern Ireland (1972--1994).

机译:劳动,国家与种族冲突:对英国在巴勒斯坦(1920--1939)和北爱尔兰(1972--1994)的统治的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis is a political economy of ethnic conflict. It compares relations between and within three sets of actors---exclusivists, marginals, and the state---to develop an explanation of ethnic conflict. The dependent variable is ethnic violence, particularly marginals' attacks on the state and exclusivists. The independent variable is the construction and maintenance of institutions that collectively distribute jobs and other benefits to exclusivists as club goods. The intervening variable is local state officials' reliance on exclusivist support. The simple hypothesis is that ethnic violence by marginals is associated with the state's reliance on the support of solidary exclusivists.; Split labor market theory is employed to show how ethnic conflict in two cases, Palestine and Northern Ireland, was rooted in exclusivists' success in constraining marginals' opportunities in local labor markets. Economic exclusion fueled support among the marginals for violence directed against both exclusivists and the state. Collective action theory is used to explain the institutions that maintained ethnic solidarity among Jewish and Protestant exclusivists.; The key to the state's failure to reduce ethnic conflict, particularly marginals' exclusion and subordination, was its acquiescence in the maintenance of split labor markets. Where the state was dependent on the exclusivists for local support, it tacitly endorsed the split labor market. The Palestine Government's local dependence on Jewish immigration and investment for customs revenues compelled it to accept Jewish exclusivism in the labor market despite Arab protests and violence. In Northern Ireland, the state increased public service and security force employment for Protestants to insulate Britain from the conflict at the expense of continuing Catholic opposition. But declining Protestant solidarity and increasing British state power in the economy led gradually to the integration of labor markets and the conciliation of Catholics.; A most different systems research design is employed to identify the underlying causes of violent ethnic conflict in spite of state officials' efforts to control local society. The analysis is then expanded to compare and contrast developments in both cases overtime, accounting for the intensification of conflict in Palestine and its gradual reduction in Northern Ireland.
机译:本文是种族冲突的政治经济学。它比较了三类行为者之间的关系-排他主义者,边际主义者和国家-来解释种族冲突。因变量是种族暴力,尤其是边缘人群对国家和排他主义者的攻击。独立变量是机构的建设和维护,这些机构将工作和其他福利作为俱乐部商品集体分配给排他主义者。干预变量是地方政府官员对排他主义支持的依赖。一个简单的假设是,边缘人的种族暴力与国家对独立排他主义者的依赖有关。运用劳动力市场分割理论来说明巴勒斯坦和北爱尔兰这两种情况下的种族冲突是如何根植于排他主义者在限制当地劳动力市场上的边际机会方面的成功。经济排斥加剧了边缘人对针对排他主义者和国家的暴力行为的支持。集体行动理论被用来解释维持犹太人和新教徒专有主义者之间种族团结的制度。国家未能减少种族冲突,特别是边缘人被排斥和从属的失败的关键在于其默许维持分裂的劳动力市场。在国家依靠排他性人士寻求当地支持的地方,它默许了分裂的劳动力市场。巴勒斯坦政府对犹太移民和当地投资的依赖,以获取海关收入,尽管阿拉伯抗议和暴力,巴勒斯坦政府还是不得不接受犹太人在劳动力市场上的排他主义。在北爱尔兰,该州增加了新教徒的公共服务和安全部队的就业,以使英国与冲突隔离,以天主教徒的持续反对为代价。但是,新教徒团结度的下降和英国政府在经济中的统治力的增强,逐渐导致了劳动力市场的整合和天主教徒的和解。尽管国家官员努力控制当地社会,但采用了最不同的系统研究设计来确定暴力种族冲突的根本原因。然后扩大分析范围,以比较和对比这两个案件在加班期间的事态发展,这说明了巴勒斯坦冲突的加剧和北爱尔兰冲突的逐步减少。

著录项

  • 作者

    O Murchu, Niall Fionnbarra.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington.;

  • 授予单位 University of Washington.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Political Science International Law and Relations.; Sociology Ethnic and Racial Studies.; History European.; History Middle Eastern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 299 p.
  • 总页数 299
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;国际法;民族学;欧洲史;亚洲史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号