首页> 外文学位 >International benchmarking of integrated product development practices in the auto industry supply chain: A multigroup invariance analysis.
【24h】

International benchmarking of integrated product development practices in the auto industry supply chain: A multigroup invariance analysis.

机译:汽车行业供应链中集成产品开发实践的国际基准:多组不变性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between integrated product development (IPD) practices and product development performance in two groups of companies in the auto industry supply chain, i.e., auto manufacturers and auto parts suppliers, in two major auto producing countries, i.e., the U.S. and Germany. An extensive literature review finds six IPD practices and eleven performance variables. To develop a survey instrument, this literature review was followed by in depth interviews with practitioners and academicians and then pre testing with 8 product development professionals to gain brevity as well as to establish face and content validity. A pilot study was later conducted with 33 U.S. respondents to achieve several objectives purification, reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, as well predicative validity. Survey items were deleted, modified, and added as necessary.; A large-scale survey was then conducted in the U.S. and Germany. Using both mail and web responses, a total of 267 usable U.S. responses and 139 usable German response was received. The survey instrument later underwent a rigorous mutigroup invariance analysis using Linear Structural Relationship (LISREL) to develop measuring items that have equivalent true scores across groups to reduce type I and type II errors. After the invariant instrument was developed, the instrument was then tested for reliability as well as discriminant, convergent, and predictive validity.; A series of stepwise regression analyses later finds that each IPD practice affects a certain set of performance variables. Two-way factorial analyses of variance (ANOVA) uncovers the differences between the U.S. and Germany as well as between auto manufacturers and auto suppliers in IPD practices and performance. The differences in performance can be explained by the difference in IPD practices. Moreover, the results suggest that the industry has not been successful in integrating product development across the supply chain, i.e., from auto manufacturers to auto suppliers.; Recommendations for further study include exploring the structural relationship among possible variables, conducting a longitudinal study, studying antecedents of IPD, studying Tier 2 auto suppliers better, and validating the invariant instrument through studying companies in different industries and different countries.
机译:这项研究的目的是研究两个主要汽车生产国的汽车工业供应链中两组公司(即汽车制造商和汽车零部件供应商)的集成产品开发(IPD)做法与产品开发绩效之间的关系,即美国和德国。广泛的文献综述发现了六种IPD实践和11种性能变量。为了开发一种调查工具,在进行了这篇文献综述之后,我们与从业人员和院士进行了深入访谈,然后与8名产品开发专业人员进行了预测试,以期简洁起见,并确定面部和内容的有效性。随后与33位美国受访者进行了一项初步研究,以达到净化,可靠性,收敛性和判别效度以及预测效度的几个目标。调查项已根据需要删除,修改和添加。然后在美国和德国进行了大规模调查。使用邮件和网络回复,共收到267份美国可用回复和139份德国可用回复。调查仪器随后使用线性结构关系(LISREL)进行了严格的多组不变性分析,以开发出在各组中具有相等真实分数的测量项目,以减少I型和II型错误。开发出不变性工具后,然后对该工具进行可靠性以及判别,收敛和预测有效性的测试。随后进行的一系列逐步回归分析发现,每个IPD实践都会影响一组性能变量。双向方差分析(ANOVA)揭示了美国和德国之间以及汽车制造商和汽车供应商之间在IPD惯例和性能方面的差异。性能的差异可以通过IPD做法的差异来解释。此外,结果表明,该行业在整合整个供应链(即从汽车制造商到汽车供应商)的产品开发方面并未取得成功。进一步研究的建议包括探索可能变量之间的结构关系,进行纵向研究,研究IPD的前因,更好地研究二级汽车供应商以及通过研究不同行业和不同国家的公司来验证不变性工具。

著录项

  • 作者

    Syamil, Ahmad.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Toledo.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Toledo.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.; Engineering Automotive.; Engineering Industrial.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 214 p.
  • 总页数 214
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;自动化技术及设备;一般工业技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号