首页> 外文学位 >Macroeconomics and political institutions in Western European multi-party democracies
【24h】

Macroeconomics and political institutions in Western European multi-party democracies

机译:西欧多党民主国家的宏观经济学和政治制度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this thesis, I study three aspects of the interaction between politics and economics in coalition systems. First, theoretical and empirical issues concerning the political bargaining process over cabinet formation are addressed. Theoretical predictions on the duration of the process and its outcome are tested for the period 1950-1995. It turns out that the formation delay is increasing in the degree of ideological heterogeneity of coalition partners and that the share of portfolios secured by the formateur is decreasing in the degree of complexity of the bargaining environment. A few factors affecting the degree to which the outcome of the negotiation process can be defined as balanced are also identified. Second, I investigate the politics and economics of cabinet survival. A Proportional Hazards Specification for cabinet duration data is estimated by mean of a flexible parametric approach. I find that the hazard rate is determined by the majority status, the degree of fragmentation and ideological homogeneity of the coalition, the polarisation of the legislature and the time horizon at the moment the cabinet is formed. Interesting innovative results concern the greater stability of cabinets supported by coalitions ideologically closer to the median party and/or left-oriented. The overall state of the economy also appears to play a role. Graphical evidence suggests that the underlying distribution of duration data might be a Gompertz or a Weibull distribution, but not certainly an exponential distribution, as instead it is often assumed in the literature. Third, I look at the political and institutional determinants of fiscal policy outcomes (deficit, spending and taxation). Panel estimates show that the ideological orientation of the policymaker, the degree of cabinet instability, cross-country differences in electoral and budgetary institutions and the dispersion of political power within the ruling coalition all significantly affect fiscal policy variables. Instead, the preferences of the median voter appear to have relatively little importance. The evidence also rejects the hypothesis of systematic pre-electoral manipulation of fiscal instruments. A full description of the data-set of political indicators I have constructed and used to estimate the models in this thesis is also given. Specific attention is devoted to some methodological instances concerning the theoretical underpinning of empirical proxies. As an overview of the contents of the data-set, I discuss the evolution of basic attributes of legislatures and governments in the thirteen countries that constitute the sample for my analysis.
机译:在这篇论文中,我研究了联盟系统中政治与经济学之间相互作用的三个方面。首先,讨论了关于内阁组建的政治谈判过程的理论和经验问题。对过程持续时间及其结果的理论预测在1950-1995年期间得到了检验。事实证明,结盟伙伴的意识形态异质性程度的形成延迟正在增加,而格式制定者所担保的投资组合的份额因谈判环境的复杂性程度而降低。还确定了一些影响谈判过程的结果可以定义为平衡程度的因素。其次,我研究了内阁生存的政治经济学。机柜持续时间数据的比例危害规范是通过灵活的参数方法估算的。我发现危险率取决于多数人的地位,联盟的分裂程度和意识形态的同质性,立法机关的两极分化以及内阁形成之时的时间范围。有趣的创新结果涉及在意识形态上更接近中位政党和/或朝左的联盟所支持的内阁的更大稳定性。经济的整体状况似乎也发挥了作用。图形证据表明,持续时间数据的基础分布可能是Gompertz分布或Weibull分布,但不一定是指数分布,因为文献中经常采用这种分布。第三,我考察了财政政策结果(赤字,支出和税收)的政治和制度决定因素。小组估计表明,决策者的意识形态取向,内阁不稳定的程度,选举和预算机构的跨国差异以及执政联盟内部政治权力的分散都对财政政策变量产生重大影响。取而代之的是,中位选民的偏好似乎没有那么重要。证据还否定了选举前对财政工具进行系统操纵的假设。本文还完整描述了我构建并用于估计模型的政治指标数据集。特别关注一些与经验代理的理论基础有关的方法论实例。作为数据集内容的概述,我讨论了构成本研究样本的13个国家的立法机关和政府的基本属性的演变。

著录项

  • 作者

    Carmignani, Fabrizio.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Glasgow (United Kingdom).;

  • 授予单位 University of Glasgow (United Kingdom).;
  • 学科 Economics.;Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 461 p.
  • 总页数 461
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 海洋工程;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号