首页> 外文学位 >Virtual mentoring: A quantitative study to measure the effectiveness of virtual mentoring versus face -to -face mentoring.
【24h】

Virtual mentoring: A quantitative study to measure the effectiveness of virtual mentoring versus face -to -face mentoring.

机译:虚拟指导:定量研究以衡量虚拟指导与面对面指导的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As organizations continue to become global, one of the key organizational challenges of the 21st century is developing future leaders who can continue the vision of the organization. In this global world, attracting and developing future leaders lends organizations a competitive advantage while an inability to develop future leaders weakens them. Many organizations are becoming global virtual organizations and mentoring and coaching is extensively being used as an important tool for developing future leaders. The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to examine the difference on number of promotions and the number of times the mentee was assigned additional opportunities by face-to-face or virtual mentoring model, and (b) to assess to what extent does face-to-face or virtual mentoring model moderate the relationship between mentoring activities and the number of promotions and the number of times the mentee was assigned additional opportunities. The research strategy used for this study was non-experimental and descriptive and employed a quantitative research methodology. Alleman Mentoring Activities Questionnaire (AMAQ) was the primary instrument used to collect mentoring relationship data for this study. The results of this research determined that face-to-face mentoring relationship may lead to more promotions, while there were no differences on the number of additional opportunities a mentee receives with the chosen mentoring model---virtual or face-to-face.
机译:随着组织继续走向全球化,21世纪组织面临的主要挑战之一是培养能够延续组织愿景的未来领导者。在这个全球化的世界中,吸引和培养未来的领导者可以使组织获得竞争优势,而无法培养未来的领导者则会削弱组织。许多组织正在成为全球虚拟组织,而指导和教练已被广泛用作培养未来领导者的重要工具。这项研究的目的是双重的:(a)研究晋升次数的差异以及通过面对面或虚拟导师模型为受训者分配更多机会的次数,以及(b)评估到什么程度面对面的或虚拟的指导模型是否适度了指导活动与晋升次数以及被指导者被分配更多机会的次数之间的关系。本研究使用的研究策略是非实验性和描述性的,并采用了定量研究方法。 Alleman指导活动调查表(AMAQ)是用于收集本研究指导关系数据的主要工具。这项研究的结果确定了面对面的指导关系可能会导致更多晋升,而通过选择的指导模型(虚拟或面对面),受指导者获得的其他机会的数量没有差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Khan, Abdussalam A.;

  • 作者单位

    Capella University.;

  • 授予单位 Capella University.;
  • 学科 Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 127 p.
  • 总页数 127
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号