首页> 外文学位 >Community policing and community adjudication: Toward a theory of organizational co-evolution in criminal justice administration.
【24h】

Community policing and community adjudication: Toward a theory of organizational co-evolution in criminal justice administration.

机译:社区警务和社区裁决:建立刑事司法管理​​中的组织协同进化理论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines how and why police agencies that engage in community policing strategies interact with judicial agencies that utilize community adjudication, including restorative justice, community courts, community prosecution, and similar tactics. This study investigates the interaction between community policing and community adjudication to determine organizational and intergovernmental strategies that permit both types of agencies to achieve common goals in a way that is responsive to the communities they serve.; This study used five geographic locations as study sites: Boulder, Colorado; Portland, Oregon, Santa Clara, California; Woodbury, Minnesota, and the Navajo Nation in New Mexico, Arizona, and Utah. As this was a qualitative research effort, data were primarily collected through extensive interviews and observation.; The findings of this study suggest that there are multiple phenomena that simultaneously occur. Borrowing the concept of ecological co-evolution from the natural sciences and interagency cooperation from the discipline of public administration, a new understanding of criminal justice administration emerged---organizational co-evolution. Therefore, the overarching finding of this study is that as community policing agencies and courts using community adjudication strategies interact with one another, each organization is changed in what appears to be a mutually beneficial way.; One of the results of this interaction is the emergence of a dual-path system of criminal justice administration that is informal, though complimentary, to the traditional justice system. Beyond this, it was discovered that this dual-path system of criminal justice seems to work best when there is little or no formal policy that guides the process. This, as believed by the practitioners who participated in this study, assures flexibility and responsiveness in decision-making based on the individual circumstances associated with each criminal episode.; To accommodate the need to manage each crime in an individual manner, and at the same time be attentive to community member needs, each of the agencies in this study developed informal and reciprocal personal relationships within and between each type of agency---police and court. The result is a flexible justice system that seems, under certain circumstances, to improve service to crime victims, community members, and offenders.
机译:这项研究探讨了参与社区警务策略的警察机构如何以及为什么与利用社区裁决的司法机构进行互动,包括恢复性司法,社区法院,社区起诉和类似策略。这项研究调查了社区治安与社区裁决之间的相互作用,以确定组织和政府间战略,以允许这两种类型的机构以对其所服务的社区作出响应的方式实现共同目标。本研究使用五个地理位置作为研究地点:科罗拉多州博尔德;俄勒冈州波特兰,加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉;明尼苏达州的伍德伯里和新墨西哥州,亚利桑那州和犹他州的纳瓦霍族。由于这是一项定性研究工作,因此数据主要是通过广泛的访谈和观察收集的。这项研究的发现表明,有多种现象同时发生。从自然科学中借鉴生态共进化的概念,从公共行政学领域借鉴机构间合作的概念,对刑事司法管理​​的新认识出现了-组织共进化。因此,这项研究的主要发现是,随着社区治安机构和使用社区审判策略的法院相互影响,每个组织的变化似乎是互惠互利的。这种互动的结果之一是,刑事司法行政双轨制的出现,它是对传统司法制度的非正式(尽管是补充)。除此之外,还发现当很少或没有正式的政策指导程序时,这种刑事司法双轨制似乎最有效。正如参加本研究的从业人员所认为的,这确保了根据与每个犯罪事件有关的具体情况进行决策的灵活性和响应能力。为了适应以个体方式处理每种犯罪的需求,同时注意社区成员的需求,本研究中的每个机构都在每种机构内部和之间建立了非正式和对等的个人关系-警察和警察法庭。结果是建立了一个灵活的司法系统,在某些情况下,似乎可以改善对犯罪受害者,社区成员和罪犯的服务。

著录项

  • 作者

    Settles, Tanya Lynne.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Colorado at Denver.;

  • 授予单位 University of Colorado at Denver.;
  • 学科 Political Science Public Administration.; Sociology Criminology and Penology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 251 p.
  • 总页数 251
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;法学各部门;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号