首页> 外文学位 >The Relationship Between Learning Styles and the Choice of Learning Environment for Hospitality and Tourism Undergraduate Students.
【24h】

The Relationship Between Learning Styles and the Choice of Learning Environment for Hospitality and Tourism Undergraduate Students.

机译:酒店和旅游专业大学生学习风格与学习环境选择的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between learning styles and the choice of learning environment for Hospitality and Tourism undergraduate students. An anonymous two-part survey was sent to the instructors of Introduction to Hospitality and Tourism Management courses (both online and face-to-face) in four schools in the state of Florida. The survey was designed to gather information related to the following three research questions related to MBTI profiles for undergraduate students in attempt to identify differences between students enrolled in online classes and those in face-to-face classes. In order to determine the probability of predicting course choice behavior of undergraduate Hospitality and Tourism students, the following factors were controlled in this research: age; gender; enrollment status; employment status; university; whether they had taken an online course previously in high school, college, or other places; how many online courses they previously took; and who helped them select the delivery mode of their courses.;There were 323 usable responses, which included a majority of the most common types as ESTJ. When the differences between online and face-to-face course students were analyzed through chi-square tests, the results showed significant differences between two groups for all four profiles. Overall, the most common profile for face-to-face students was ESTJ, while the most common profile for online students were ISTP. In order to examine the unique contribution of learning styles on Hospitality and Tourism students' course choice, a hierarchical logistic regression model was used. The results of the model indicated that only profile one (P1) and profile four (P4) were significant predictors among the four profiles, along with the total number of online courses previously taken.;The conclusions suggested that by looking at P1, P4, and toc1, with a 95% confidence level, the probability of students choosing face-to-face classes can be predicted if the students are extrovert, judging, and previously had taken less than five online courses. If learning styles can be determined ahead of time, students can choose appropriate courses, instructors can develop teaching strategies that will match students' desirable learning styles, and the number of face-to-face and online courses can be adjusted in each program to offer an appropriate number of courses each semester.
机译:本研究的目的是探讨酒店和旅游专业大学生学习风格与学习环境选择之间的关系。一项匿名的由两部分组成的调查被发送给佛罗里达州四所学校的酒店和旅游管理概论课程(在线和面对面)的讲师。该调查旨在收集与以下三个与MBTI个人资料相关的研究问题相关的信息,以供本科生使用,以找出在线课程的学生与面对面课程的学生之间的差异。为了确定预测酒店和旅游专业本科生选课行为的可能性,本研究控制了以下因素:年龄;性别;入学情况;就业状况;大学;他们以前是否曾在高中,大学或其他地方上过在线课程;他们以前参加了多少在线课程; ;有谁帮助他们选择了课程的授课方式。;共有323个可用的答案,其中包括大多数最常见的ESTJ类型。当通过卡方检验分析在线和面对面课程学生之间的差异时,结果显示,对于所有四个个人资料,两组之间存在显着差异。总体而言,面对面学生最常见的个人资料是ESTJ,而在线学生最常见的个人资料是ISTP。为了检验学习方式对款待和旅游学生课程选择的独特贡献,使用了分层逻辑回归模型。该模型的结果表明,只有配置文件1(P1)和配置文件4(P4)是这四个配置文件以及先前参加的在线课程总数的重要预测指标。结论表明,通过查看P1,P4,和toc1(置信度为95%),如果学生性格外向,判断并以前参加过少于五门在线课程,则可以预测学生选择面对面授课的可能性。如果可以提前确定学习方式,则学生可以选择合适的课程,教师可以制定适合学生期望的学习方式的教学策略,并且可以在每个程序中调整面对面和在线课程的数量,以提供每学期开设适当数量的课程。

著录项

  • 作者

    Malan-Rush, Gunce.;

  • 作者单位

    University of South Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of South Florida.;
  • 学科 Adult education.;Vocational education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 104 p.
  • 总页数 104
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号