首页> 外文学位 >An exploratory study of the interactions between Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act and workers' compensation insurance: Unintended consequences.
【24h】

An exploratory study of the interactions between Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act and workers' compensation insurance: Unintended consequences.

机译:探索性研究《美国残疾人法案》第一章与工人赔偿保险之间的相互作用:意外后果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) 1990 and workers' compensation insurance provide assurances for disabled and injured employees. The ADA prohibits discrimination in employment and access to public facilities and accommodations for persons with disabilities. Workers' compensation provisions provide reduced incomes and medical benefits for employees when they cannot work due to job related injury or disability.; There is little research on the interactions between the Americans with Disabilities Act and workers' compensation insurance provisions. A review of the literature and pending ADA litigation showed the majority of ADA claims involved employed individuals who were injured or disabled on the job. Unlike workers' compensation insurance provisions, the ADA allows monetary punitive damages, up to {dollar}300,000, if an employer is found guilty of employment discrimination against disabled workers. The monetary penalty associated with the ADA can be viewed as an incentive for employers to settle workers' compensation claims.; Twenty-six in-depth interviews were conducted with participants' familiar with worker's compensation, the ADA, and/or disability issues. Participants included attorneys, employers, policy makers, insurers, union representatives and disabled and injured workers. The operational questions included attorneys' uses of the punitive provisions of the ADA during workers' compensation negotiations and employer's attitudes towards injured or disabled employees.; The study results indicted that anti-discrimination provisions of the ADA are emerging in workers' compensation negotiations and the economic interests of attorneys, employers and other actors, created barriers to disabled workers' desires to return to work.
机译:1990年《美国残疾人法》(ADA)和工人赔偿保险为残疾人和受伤的雇员提供保证。 ADA禁止残疾人在就业和使用公共设施及住宿方面的歧视。工人的赔偿规定为因工作相关的伤害或残疾而无法工作的雇员减少了收入和医疗福利。关于《美国残疾人法案》与工人赔偿保险条款之间的相互作用的研究很少。对文献的回顾和即将进行的ADA诉讼显示,ADA的大多数索赔涉及在职人士中有受伤或残疾的受雇人员。与工人补偿保险的规定不同,如果发现雇主对残疾工人实行了就业歧视,则ADA最高可提供{300}美元的金钱惩罚性赔偿。可以将与ADA相关的罚款视为鼓励雇主解决工人赔偿要求的诱因。对参与者进行了二十六次深入访谈,参与者熟悉工人的薪酬,ADA和/或残疾问题。参加者包括律师,雇主,政策制定者,保险公司,工会代表以及残疾人和受伤的工人。操作上的问题包括律师在工人赔偿谈判中对ADA惩罚性规定的使用以及雇主对受伤或残疾雇员的态度。研究结果表明,ADA的反歧视规定正在工人赔偿谈判中出现,律师,雇主和其他行为者的经济利益为残疾人提供了重返工作的愿望的障碍。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shane, Christine Lewis.;

  • 作者单位

    Brandeis University, The Florence Heller Graduate School for Advanced Studies in Social Welfare.;

  • 授予单位 Brandeis University, The Florence Heller Graduate School for Advanced Studies in Social Welfare.;
  • 学科 Sociology Public and Social Welfare.; Sociology Industrial and Labor Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 161 p.
  • 总页数 161
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会福利、社会救济、社会保障;社会学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号