首页> 外文学位 >An economic analysis of inter-regional and inter-sectoral R&D spillovers as sources of economic growth.
【24h】

An economic analysis of inter-regional and inter-sectoral R&D spillovers as sources of economic growth.

机译:区域间和部门间R&D溢出作为经济增长来源的经济分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The relationship between research activity and economic well-being are examined within the U.S. manufacturing and agricultural sectors for the periods 1950–1982 and 1964–1986. State crop, livestock, and aggregate agricultural total factor productivity (TFP) data, 1950–1982, are examined for evidence of convergence to a single TFP level (σ-convergence) or to a steady state rate of growth (β-or conditional convergence). Empirical results do not support σ-convergence but do support β-convergence. The rate of β-convergence is variable and depends on research and development (R&D) spillins from other states, private R&D, and farmers' schooling. U.S. aggregate manufacturing and agricultural data, 1964-1986, are examined for evidence that R&D spillovers do exist. The empirical results support the notion that research activity in one sector does impact resource allocation decisions in another sector. Own-sector R&D stocks are shown to have strong positive impacts on output supply and input demand decisions. Public agricultural research stocks were shown to have stronger impacts on the manufacturing sector's output supply and input demand decisions than the private manufacturing R&D stocks on the agricultural sector's decisions. Private manufacturing R&D and public agricultural research was shown to be complements. The finding of strong positive interstate and inter-sector spillover effects have policy implications. First, independent state planning of agricultural research is inefficient and cooperation across states boundaries including establishment of new political jurisdictions for financing public agricultural research can enhance efficiency. Second, public planning of agricultural research should capture all positive externalities (own-sector plus the externalities that exist outside of the sector).
机译:在1950–1982年和1964–1986年期间,研究活动在美国制造业和农业部门之间进行了研究。研究了1950-1982年间的国家农作物,牲畜和农业总全要素生产率(TFP)数据,以寻找收敛到单一TFP水平(σ收敛)或稳态增长率(β或条件收敛)的证据。 )。经验结果不支持σ收敛,但支持β收敛。 β收敛的速率是可变的,并且取决于其他州的研究与开发(R&D)溢出,私人R&D和农民的受教育程度。审查了1964-1986年的美国制造业和农业总数据,以寻找确实存在研发溢出效应的证据。实证结果支持以下观点:一个部门的研究活动确实会影响另一部门的资源分配决策。事实表明,本部门的研发存货对产出供应和投入需求决策具有强烈的积极影响。事实证明,公共农业研究存量对制造业部门的产出供需决策的影响要大于私人制造业研发存量对农业部门决策的影响。私营制造业的研发和公共农业研究被证明是补充。州际和部门间溢出效应强烈的发现具有政策意义。首先,独立的国家农业研究计划效率低下,跨州边界的合作(包括建立新的政治管辖区以资助公共农业研究)可以提高效率。其次,农业研究的公共计划应涵盖所有积极的外部因素(本部门加上该部门外部存在的外部因素)。

著录项

  • 作者

    McCunn, Alan Lowell.;

  • 作者单位

    Iowa State University.;

  • 授予单位 Iowa State University.;
  • 学科 Economics Agricultural.; Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 87 p.
  • 总页数 87
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农业经济;经济学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号