首页> 外文学位 >PRC foreign policy responsiveness to domestic ethical sentiment: Understanding the link between ethics and regime legitimacy (China).
【24h】

PRC foreign policy responsiveness to domestic ethical sentiment: Understanding the link between ethics and regime legitimacy (China).

机译:中国外交政策对国内道德情绪的反应:了解道德与政权合法性之间的联系(中国)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although most nations provide moral justification for their foreign policies, the prominence of ethical rationalizations in the People's Republic of China's (P.R.C.) foreign policy is striking. Moreover, this moralizing tone has not been limited to one leader, but has been a consistent characteristic throughout P.R.C. foreign policy. What purpose do these moral pronouncements serve?; This study was premised upon the belief that a link exists between P.R.C. ethical posturing in the international arena and its claim on domestic legitimacy. Thus, the study sought to examine P.R.C. regime responsiveness to domestic, rather than international, ethical culture by surveying popular sentiment towards ethics and Chinese foreign policy. Survey findings revealed that while foreign policy ranked low on the average Chinese's list of priorities, most were deeply concerned with China's international reputation. Most also felt that China should honor its international obligations to the best of its abilities in order to maintain this standing.; This study hypothesizes that P.R.C. regimes have been generally attentive to this popular ethical sentiment because they realize its importance in sustaining regime legitimacy. This attentiveness is demonstrated by the fact that P.R.C. regimes have consistently relied upon a number of popularly accepted ethical themes to shape China's identity in the international arena. Moral pronouncements in P.R.C. foreign policy play to popular expectations regarding China's international reputation; a regime response conditioned by its need for domestic legitimacy. The study concludes by demonstrating, in its case study chapters, how supplementing a traditional realist explanatory paradigm with the insights gleaned from acknowledging the centrality of P.R.C. ethical defenses to domestic legitimacy, will lead to a clearer understanding of P.R.C. foreign policy behavior.
机译:尽管大多数国家为其外交政策提供了道义上的理由,但在中华人民共和国(P.R.C.)的外交政策中,道德合理化的地位却令人瞩目。而且,这种道德基调不仅限于一位领导人,而且在整个中国都是一致的特征。对外政策。这些道德声明的目的是什么?这项研究的前提是相信P.R.C.国际舞台上的道德姿态及其对国内合法性的要求。因此,该研究试图审查P.R.C.政权通过调查大众对道德和中国外交政策的看法,对国内而不是国际道德文化作出反应。调查结果表明,尽管外交政策在中国人的平均优先事项中排名较低,但大多数人都对中国的国际声誉深表关切。大多数人还认为,中国应尽其最大能力履行国际义务,以保持这一地位。这项研究假设P.R.C.政权一般都关注这种普遍的道德观念,因为它们意识到其在维持政权合法性方面的重要性。 P.R.C.的事实证明了这种专心。政权一贯依靠一系列广为接受的伦理主题来塑造中国在国际舞台上的身份。中华人民共和国的道德声明外交政策对中国的国际声誉发挥了普遍的期望;以其对国内合法性的需求为条件的政权回应。本研究的结论是在其案例研究的各章中,说明如何通过承认P.R.C的中心地位而获得的见解补充传统的现实主义解释范式。对国内合法性的道德辩护将使人们更加了解P.R.C.外交政策行为。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cummings, Lucy Marie.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 371 p.
  • 总页数 371
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;世界史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号