首页> 外文学位 >Grit Within the Context of Career Success: A Mixed Methods Study
【24h】

Grit Within the Context of Career Success: A Mixed Methods Study

机译:职业成功背景下的勇气:混合方法研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Grit has been shown to predict success in several domains such as West Point summer program completion, National Spelling Bee placement, and educational attainment (Duckworth, Peterson, Matthews, & Kelly, 2007), but had not yet been studied within the career context. Having a successful career can provide meaning, identity, and life satisfaction (Erdogan, Bauer, Truxillo, & Mansfield, 2012; Forest, Mageau, Sarrazin, & Morin, 2011; Kram, Wasserman, & Yip, 2012). This sequential explanatory mixed methods study examined whether grit predicted career success, and explored the role of grit in career success for gritty, successful working adults. Positive psychology (Seligman & Csiksentmihalyi, 2000) was used as a theoretical framework to guide the topic of study, selection of participants for the qualitative phase, and to create start-up codes in the qualitative analysis. Self-determination theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000) was used to frame the study of grit and social cognitive career theory (Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 1994) was used to frame the study of career success.;Participants in the quantitative phase included 423 working adults. Quantitative data sources included scores on the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S) (Duckworth & Quinn, 2009), the Career Satisfaction Scale (CSS) (Greenhaus, Parasuraman, & Wormley, 1990), a researcher-created Career Status measure, and Salary information. Data were analyzed using correlational analysis, independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, and multiple regression. The correlational analysis showed that in this study, grit did not significantly predict career success. Level of grit did not differ based on gender or occupational type (traditional, non-standard, or mix). Multiple regressions demonstrated that grit did not significantly add to any of the models using age and gender as covariates.;Participants in the qualitative phase included 5 individuals from the quantitative phase who scored in the top quartile in grit and career success. The qualitative data sources were individual interviews, which were transcribed and analyzed by the author. Data were analyzed inductively using pattern codes and deductively using the theoretical frameworks. Case summaries were written for each participant in the qualitative phase, and major themes were illustrated visually in several models. Findings suggest that although gritty, successful participants perceived grit as necessary for their own career success, they did not think it was sufficient. Largely perceived as "strong work ethic" or "working hard", grit manifested differently in individual workplaces. Perseverance seemed more relevant to the career success experience than passion, and the aspect of working toward long-term goals did not resonate with these participants in the career context. Implications for this study include considering the importance of networking and taking advantage of opportunities in career development, on top of a strong work ethic. Schools interested in adding grit to their character strengths curriculum may find these results of interest, as the findings from this study indicate a non-significant relationship between grit and career success, salary, and career status.
机译:砂砾已被证明可以预测在多个方面的成功,例如西点暑期课程的完成,国家拼字比赛的安排和教育程度(Duckworth,Peterson,Matthews和Kelly,2007),但尚未在职业背景下进行研究。拥有成功的职业可以提供意义,身份和生活满意度(埃尔多安,鲍尔,特鲁希略和曼斯菲尔德,2012;森林,玛格奥,萨拉辛和莫林,2011;克拉姆,瓦瑟曼和叶普,2012)。这项循序渐进的混合方法研究研究了粗砂是否可以预测职业成功,并探索了粗砂在坚韧,成功的上班族的职业成功中的作用。积极心理学(Seligman&Csiksentmihalyi,2000)被用作理论框架来指导研究主题,定性阶段参与者的选择以及定性分析中的启动代码。自我决定理论(Ryan&Deci,2000)被用于研究勇气的研究,社会认知职业理论(Lent,Brown,&Hackett,1994)被用来研究职业成功的研究。包括423名在职成年人。定量数据来源包括短粒度评分(Grit-S)(Duckworth&Quinn,2009),职业满意度量表(CSS)(Greenhaus,Parasuraman和Wormley,1990),研究人员创建的职业状况测度和薪资信息。使用相关分析,独立样本t检验,单向方差分析和多元回归分析数据。相关分析表明,在这项研究中,毅力并不能显着预测职业成功。坚毅程度根据性别或职业类型(传统,非标准或混合)而不同。多元回归表明,使用年龄和性别作为协变量,砂砾并没有显着增加任何模型。定性阶段的参与者包括定量阶段的5个人,他们在砂砾和职业成就方面得分最高。定性数据来源是个人访谈,由作者抄录和分析。使用模式代码对数据进行归纳分析,并使用理论框架对数据进行归纳分析。在定性阶段为每个参与者编写了案例摘要,并在多个模型中直观地说明了主要主题。研究结果表明,尽管坚强,成功的参与者认为毅然对于自己的职业成功是必要的,但他们认为这并不足够。沙砾通常被认为是“坚强的职业道德”或“努力工作”,在各个工作场所表现出不同的表现。毅力似乎比事业激情更重要的是与事业成功的经历有关,朝着长期目标努力的方面并没有使这些参与者在事业背景中产生共鸣。这项研究的涵义包括在强大的职业道德基础上考虑人际网络的重要性以及利用职业发展中的机会。有兴趣在其性格特长课程中增加毅力的学校可能会发现这些有趣的结果,因为这项研究的结果表明,毅力与职业成就,薪水和职业状况之间没有显着关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Clark, Rachael S.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Cincinnati.;

  • 授予单位 University of Cincinnati.;
  • 学科 Psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 235 p.
  • 总页数 235
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号