首页> 外文学位 >Social movements and their knowledges: An activist ethnography of the Metro Network for Social Justice (Ontario).
【24h】

Social movements and their knowledges: An activist ethnography of the Metro Network for Social Justice (Ontario).

机译:社会运动及其知识:Metro Network for Social Justice(Ontario)的激进民族志。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is about the knowledge arising from activist practice and its significance for re-imagining democratic emancipatory politics. I argue that social movements are producers of knowledge. Movement-based knowledge is largely tacit, practical and unsystematized. It is partial and situated, arising from concrete engagement in social struggle, and embedded in specific times and places. Secondly, I argue that coalitions of social movements are a particularly fertile location for the production of social movement knowledge. Thirdly, social movement knowledges are central to the renewal of emancipatory politics. However, fourth, the role and prominence of knowledge and knowledge production is contentious on the left and is an arena of ongoing challenge and conflict.; This argument is grounded in a detailed ‘ethnography’ of the Metro Network for Social Justice (MNSJ) over a five-year period (1992–97). The MNSJ is a cross-sectoral, multi-issue, permanent social justice coalition in Toronto. The ethnography represents the MNSJ as a site for political, organizational and intellectual innovation through a detailed examination of how MNSJ activists generated new practices, and the processes by which knowledge arising from these practices was articulated, systematized, and mobilized for politics.; In chapters 4, 5, and 6, I document three arenas of activist praxis: the development of democratic organization and coalition building; the emergence of a new ‘urban politics’ that, located in a world city and working at multiple scales, linked local agency to global power; and a multi-layered popular and activist education project that problematized knowledge and knowledge production for social movements and for the broader left. Through the ethnography, I illuminate and argue for the importance of coalitional, urban, and cultural politics in re-imagining emancipatory politics in the contemporary period.; I suggest in chapter 3 that MNSJ activists were drawing on older and wider activist legacies (knowledges), both urban and national, in the new political context of post-free trade Canada. They were also grappling with formal discourses about agency, power, and change in the context of concrete activist dilemmas in a new political era. These discourses included various strands of political economy, cultural studies and urban theory. I explore these discourses in chapter 2 as different approaches to the social that, in various ways, help me interpret and interrogate the agency arising from social movements like the MNSJ and its articulation to larger processes of social transformation.; The ethnography provides a starting point for considering the political implications for social movements of prioritizing knowledge production and the cultural politics it connotes. This also raises broader theoretical and political questions for progressive politics, critical theory, and scholarship on social movements. I explore some of these issues in both the introductory and concluding chapters.
机译:本文是关于激进主义实践的知识及其对重新构想民主解放政治的意义。我认为社会运动是知识的产生者。基于运动的知识在很大程度上是默契的,实用的,没有系统的。它是局部的和局部的,源于对社会斗争的具体参与,并根植于特定的时间和地点。其次,我认为社会运动联盟是生产社会运动知识的一个特别肥沃的地方。第三,社会运动知识对于解放政治的更新至关重要。但是,第四,知识和知识生产的作用和重要性在左翼是有争议的,并且是不断挑战和冲突的舞台。这一论点是基于为期五年(1992-97年)的都市社会正义网络(MNSJ)的详细“民族志”为基础的。 MNSJ是多伦多的一个跨部门,多问题的永久性社会正义联盟。民族志通过详细研究MNSJ活动家如何产生新的实践以及从这些实践中产生的知识被阐明,系统化和动员用于政治的过程,来代表MNSJ作为政治,组织和知识创新的场所。在第4、5和6章中,我记录了激进主义者实践的三个领域:民主组织的发展和联盟的建设;民主组织的发展;民主组织的发展。一种新的“城市政治”的出现,它坐落在一个世界城市,并且在多个层​​面上开展工作,将地方机构与全球力量联系在一起;以及一个多层次的大众和激进主义教育项目,使社会运动和最广泛的左翼知识和知识生产出现问题。通过人种志,我阐明并论证了联盟,城市和文化政治在当代重新构想解放政治的重要性。我在第3章中建议,在加拿大自由贸易后的新政治背景下,MNSJ激进主义者正在利用城市和国家范围内的更老的激进主义者遗产(知识)。在新的政治时代中,在具体的激进主义困境的背景下,他们还努力应对有关代理,权力和变革的正式论述。这些论述包括政治经济学,文化研究和城市理论的各个方面。我将在第二章中探讨这些话语,作为不同的社会方法,以各种方式帮助我解释和审讯诸如MNSJ之类的社会运动及其对更大的社会变革过程的阐述所产生的代理。人种学为考虑优先考虑知识生产的社会运动及其所暗示的文化政治提供了一个政治起点。这也为进步政治,批判理论和社会运动学者提出了更广泛的理论和政治问题。我将在介绍性章节和结论性章节中探讨其中的一些问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Conway, Janet Mary.;

  • 作者单位

    York University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 York University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Anthropology Cultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 439 p.
  • 总页数 439
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;人类学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号