首页> 外文学位 >Applied mathematics and reading for information scores on the American College Testing (ACT) Work Keys assessment: Comparing groups by race, gender, and educational level.
【24h】

Applied mathematics and reading for information scores on the American College Testing (ACT) Work Keys assessment: Comparing groups by race, gender, and educational level.

机译:美国大学考试(ACT)工作重点评估中的应用数学和阅读信息得分:按种族,性别和教育水平比较小组。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine if there were statistically as well as meaningfully significant differences on the ACT Work Keys assessment in the areas of Applied Mathematics and Reading for Information attributable to gender (male or female), race (Black or White), or level of education (secondary or postsecondary). Participants were 1,634 high school students, technical/2-year college students, and employees from a local industry in Dothan, Alabama. Each of these participants completed the Applied Mathematics and Reading for Information subtests of the ACT Work Keys assessment in the winter quarter of 2001. The variables selected from the data collected by the Work Keys Career Center in Dothan, Alabama consisted of participants' scores from these two subtests and self-reported data of gender, race, and level of education on the Work Keys answer folder. Fourteen research questions were formulated regarding statistically significant gender, race, and educational level differences in Applied Mathematics and Reading for Information Work Keys assessment scores.; Two univariate ANOVAs were conducted to evaluate the effects of gender, race, and educational level on participant skill level in Applied Mathematics and Reading for Information. Main effects, two-way interactions, and three-way interactions were examined in this study.; The results of this study indicated that statistically significant differences existed on the Applied Mathematics assessment for Blacks and Whites and for secondary and postsecondary level students and on Reading for Information assessment for Blacks and Whites and for secondary and postsecondary level students. Skill levels were higher for the White participants than for the Black participants. Skill levels were also higher for the postsecondary students than for the secondary students.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定ACT工作重点评估在应用数学和信息阅读领域是否归因于性别(男性或女性),种族(黑人或白人),或受教育程度(中学或中学后)。参加者为1,634名高中生,技术/ 2年制大学生以及阿拉巴马州多森市一家当地企业的员工。这些参与者中的每一个都在2001年冬季季度完成了ACT工作关键字评估的应用数学和信息阅读子测验。从阿拉巴马州多森的工作关键字职业中心收集的数据中选择变量,包括参与者的得分。在Work Keys答案文件夹中进行了两个子测验以及自我报告的性别,种族和受教育程度的数据。在应用数学和信息工作重点阅读评分中,就统计学上显着的性别,种族和教育水平差异提出了十四个研究问题。进行了两个单变量方差分析,以评估性别,种族和教育水平对应用数学和信息阅读中参与者技能水平的影响。本研究考察了主要作用,双向相互作用和三向相互作用。这项研究的结果表明,在黑人和白人,中级和中专生的应用数学评估以及在黑人和白人以及中级和中专生的信息阅读评估中,存在统计学上的显着差异。白人参与者的技能水平高于黑人参与者。大专生的技能水平也比中专生高。

著录项

  • 作者

    Barnes, Shirley Lanier.;

  • 作者单位

    Auburn University.;

  • 授予单位 Auburn University.;
  • 学科 Education Educational Psychology.; Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 p.2126
  • 总页数 107
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号