首页> 外文学位 >Urban and rural household taxation in China: Measurement, economic analysis and policy implication.
【24h】

Urban and rural household taxation in China: Measurement, economic analysis and policy implication.

机译:中国的城乡居民税收:计量,经济分析和政策含义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this research, I measure the tax burden—the level of taxation relative to income—for both urban and rural households. I find that, in general, the taxes that Chinese urban households pay are mainly indirect taxes such as the value added, excise taxes and consumption taxes, in addition to a small amount of direct taxation (personal income tax). Taxation on rural households is largely direct, in the form of agricultural-related taxes, local fees and educational charges. I find that rural households are taxed more heavily than urban households relative to their respective incomes. I find that rural household taxation is much more regressive than urban household taxation, mainly due to the highly regressive nature of the rural direct taxation, and that the rural direct tax rates did not increase very fast in the 1990s. The main reason that rural direct taxation became an acute problem in the 1990s is the increase of rural income disparity in the 1990s and the uneven distribution of tax and fee obligations among different income groups. The relationship between government regulations and rural direct taxation is studied in a general theoretical framework. I find that government regulation on the food markets is an important factor in explaining rural direct tax burdens. The reason is that the regulation entails costs not only in policy implementation, but also in corruption, since local officials can impose extra charges on peasants in the name of implementing the central government's regulation. I test the empirical hypotheses that regions and households more heavily regulated in grain procurement tend to have heavier rural direct taxation, more vulnerability to local bureaucratic expansion and serious corruption, lower labor and land mobility, and as a result of these, lower income growth. The data strongly support the hypotheses. Policy implications are drawn from the findings.
机译:在这项研究中,我测量了城市和农村家庭的税收负担,即相对于收入的税收水平。我发现,一般来说,中国城市家庭所缴纳的税款主要是间接税,例如增值税,消费税和消费税,以及少量的直接税(个人所得税)。对农村家庭的税收主要是直接税,形式是农业相关税,地方费用和教育费用。我发现相对于其各自的收入,农村家庭的税收要比城市家庭高。我发现,农村家庭税比城市家庭税更具回归性,这主要是由于农村直接税具有高度回归性,并且农村直接税率在1990年代并没有很快增长。农村直接税在1990年代成为一个严重问题的主要原因是1990年代农村收入差距的扩大以及不同收入群体之间税费义务的分配不均。在一般的理论框架内研究了政府法规与农村直接税之间的关系。我发现政府对食品市场的监管是解释农村直接税负的重要因素。原因是该法规不仅在政策实施方面还带来成本,而且在腐败方面也要付出代价,因为地方官员可以以实施中央政府法规的名义向农民强加额外费用。我检验了经验假设,即在谷物采购中受到更严格管制的地区和家庭往往具有较高的农村直接税,更容易受到地方官僚扩张和严重腐败的影响,劳动力和土地流动性降低,并因此而导致收入增长降低。数据有力地支持了假设。从调查结果中得出政策含义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tao, Ran.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Chicago.;
  • 学科 Economics Agricultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 88 p.
  • 总页数 88
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号