首页> 外文学位 >Our father who art in heaven, our mother who art on earth: Flannery O'Connor and the culture of mother blame.
【24h】

Our father who art in heaven, our mother who art on earth: Flannery O'Connor and the culture of mother blame.

机译:我们的父亲在天堂艺术,母亲在地球上艺术:弗兰纳里·奥康纳(Flannery O'Connor)和母亲的文化受到指责。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The works of Flannery O'Connor have continued to rise in critical esteem in the decades following her death. Recently, concerns about her understanding of feminism and political and social consciousness have emerged. Ubiquitous studies utilizing Freudian (and Jungian) hermeneutics determine that the mother-child relationships portrayed in O'Connor's fiction are problematic and reductive. Very often, an autobiographical genesis is suggested for these fictive situations; some even claim that O'Connor's relationship with her own mother was the tortured and destructive source from which her fiction derives its tension and disturbing violence. For many critics, the mother figures of Wise Blood, A Good Man is Hard to Find, Everything That Rises Must Converge—even The Violent Bear It Away—are failing humans who subsequently bring destruction to their children's lives as well.; But these studies ignore O'Connor's declared inclusion in her narratives of a moment of grace, revelation, even outright salvation which corresponds to her Catholic view of the world. The insistence that the majority of children's problems are the fault of the mother, “mother blame,” grows directly out of Freudian analysis; most psychoanalytical/feminist studies of O'Connor conclude that she reinforces patriarchal values and fails to assimilate feminist goals with her avowed religious foundations.; Yet, examination reveals O'Connor's works underscore both feminism and theology. Her fiction takes Freudian misconceptions to task, in particular rejecting the “fantasy” of the perfect mother. Her Christian view of mankind as “fallen” relieves unrealistic cultural expectations, allowing re-evaluation of some of the mother-child relationships as positive. Most importantly, O'Connor uncovers the ways in which the mother acts as receptacle for the child's moment of grace, the earthly place and moment in time where God meets man—Teilhard de Chardin's “omega points.” Repeatedly O'Connor's children come face to face with their spiritual destinies, doing so primarily through interactions with their mothers or a mother figure. Instead of adhering to the mother-blaming practices of her contemporaries, O'Connor appropriates and parodies those misconceptions to avail greater truths by framing a perception of the world which includes beliefs about life beyond death, or—in her words—a “reality of distance.”
机译:弗兰纳里·奥康纳(Flannery O'Connor)逝世后的几十年里,她的批评一直在不断提高。最近,人们开始关注她对女权主义以及政治和社会意识的理解。运用弗洛伊德(和弗洛伊德式)诠释学进行的无处不在的研究确定,奥康纳小说中描绘的母子关系是有问题的和简化的。对于这些虚构的情况,通常建议进行自传。有些人甚至声称,奥康纳(O'Connor)与自己母亲的关系是遭受折磨和破坏的根源,她的小说由此产生了这种张力和令人不安的暴力。对于许多批评家来说,明智之血,好男人很难找到,一切上升都必须收敛(甚至是暴力忍受)的母亲形象正在使那些随后也给他们的孩子的生活带来破坏。但是这些研究忽略了奥康纳在她的叙述中宣称的宽限期,启示,甚至彻底的救赎,这与她的天主教世界观相对应。坚持认为儿童的大部分问题是母亲的错,即“母亲的责备”,这直接来自弗洛伊德的分析。奥康纳(O'Connor)的大多数心理分析/女权主义研究得出的结论是,她加强了父权制价值观,并且未能以其公开的宗教基础吸收女权主义的目标。然而,检查显示奥康纳的作品强调了女权主义和神学。她的小说将弗洛伊德式的误解带到了工作中,尤其是拒绝了完美母亲的“幻想”。她的基督教徒将人类视为“堕落”的观点解除了不切实际的文化期望,从而使一些母婴关系得到了积极评价。最重要的是,奥康纳(O'Connor)揭示了母亲如何充当孩子的宽限期,神与人相遇的世俗地方和时光的支撑物-泰勒哈德·德·夏尔丁(Teilhard de Chardin)的“欧米茄积分”。奥康纳的孩子们一再面对自己的精神命运,主要是通过与母亲或母亲形象的互动来实现的。奥康纳没有坚持同时代母亲的责备做法,而是通过构筑对世界的看法来欺骗和误解那些误解,以利用更大的真理,其中包括对死亡以外生命的信仰,或者用她的话来说,“现实世界”。距离。”

著录项

  • 作者

    Whatley, Sue Brantley.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas A&M University.;

  • 授予单位 Texas A&M University.;
  • 学科 Literature American.; Womens Studies.; Theology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 230 p.
  • 总页数 230
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会学;宗教;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号