首页> 外文学位 >National response strategies to transnational challenges: The Austrian, French, and German re-regulation of the liberalization of service provision in the European Union wage.
【24h】

National response strategies to transnational challenges: The Austrian, French, and German re-regulation of the liberalization of service provision in the European Union wage.

机译:应对跨国挑战的国家应对策略:奥地利,法国和德国对欧盟工资中的服务提供自由化进行了重新监管。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines national response strategies to the liberalization of service provision in the European Union (EU) implemented by Austria, France, and Germany, with additional discussion of developments in all northern European countries. Drawing on the literature on neo-institutionalism and neo-corporatism, the study assesses the role of trade unions and employers' associations, their relative organizational configuration, and their preferences for a national re-regulation. The liberalization of service provision affords companies in service sectors, particularly the construction sector, to outsource production to subcontractors from lower wage EU member states. Efforts to create a Single Market thus clash with national regulatory authority and undermine nation-state's authority over regulating (labor) market access. However, nation-states may devise re-regulatory national response strategies. Different national “models” of macroeconomic governance generate divergent response patterns in the face of externally imposed economic liberalization depending on the relative organizational power and institutional configuration of relevant labor market interest associations. Hypotheses for their preferences are derived from the historical and rational choice institutionalist approach. Strongly neocorporatist and statist France both generate comprehensive and protectionist re-regulations, while intermediate neocorporatist Germany produces a liberal re-regulation instituting a wage differential between standard wages. Suboptimal response strategies may produce migration incentives, which can jeopardize existing wage-setting mechanisms. Analyzing these responses permits a more general prediction about various national models' capacity to cope with the pressures of Europeanization. Bridging the gap between comparative politics and international political economy and based on extensive fieldwork in all three countries, the dissertation contributes to current theoretical debates on issues such as neo-institutionalism, neocorporatism, convergence, globalization and national models.
机译:本文研究了奥地利,法国和德国对欧盟开放服务提供的国家应对策略,并进一步讨论了北欧所有国家的发展情况。该研究利用有关新制度主义和新法团主义的文献,评估了工会和雇主协会的作用,它们的相对组织结构以及对国家重新监管的偏好。服务提供的自由化使服务部门,尤其是建筑部门的公司能够将生产外包给来自欧盟低工资成员国的分包商。因此,建立单一市场的努力会与国家监管机构发生冲突,并破坏民族国家在监管(劳动力)市场准入方面的权力。但是,民族国家可能会制定重新监管的国家应对策略。面对外部施加的经济自由化,各国宏观经济治理的不同国家“模式”会产生不同的响应模式,具体取决于相关劳动力市场利益协会的相对组织力量和体制配置。对他们偏好的假设来自历史和理性选择制度主义方法。强烈的新corporatistist和statist法国都产生了全面的和保护主义的重新规制,而中级的新corporateist德国产生了一个自由的规制,建立了标准工资之间的工资差异。欠佳的应对策略可能会产生移民诱因,这可能会危害现有的工资设定机制。分析这些回应可以对各种国家模式应对欧洲化压力的能力做出更一般的预测。弥合比较政治与国际政治经济学之间的鸿沟,并基于这三个国家的广泛实地考察,论文为当前有关新制度主义,新法团主义,融合,全球化和国家模式等问题的理论辩论做出了贡献。

著录项

  • 作者

    Menz, Georg Konrad.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pittsburgh.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pittsburgh.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Sociology Industrial and Labor Relations.; Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 306 p.
  • 总页数 306
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;社会学;经济学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号