首页> 外文学位 >Maxwell, Hertz and Marconi, using the history of science and technology in science education (James Clerk Maxwell, Guglielmo Marconi, Heinrich Hertz, Michael Faraday).
【24h】

Maxwell, Hertz and Marconi, using the history of science and technology in science education (James Clerk Maxwell, Guglielmo Marconi, Heinrich Hertz, Michael Faraday).

机译:麦克斯韦(Maxwell),赫兹(Hertz)和马可尼(Marconi),在科学教育中使用科学技术史(詹姆斯·克拉克·麦克斯韦(James Clerk Maxwell),古格里尔莫·马可尼(Guglielmo Marconi),海因里希·赫兹(Heinrich Hertz),迈克尔·法拉第(Michael Faraday)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the possibility of using a Kuhnian framework to enhance the use of history in the teaching of science. The Kuhnian framework of “revolutionary” and “normal” science, it is noted, provides a simplifying yet explanatory framework for students of science, at the same time making it possible to show the daily life of scientists. Rather than focus only on heroes of science, the work examines the important work of the “normal” scientist and their interplay with “revolutionary” scientists. It is argued that seeing the daily life of the scientist within this framework can show students of science the profound impact of the seemingly simple contributions of the work of scientists. In addition, it is noted that viewing the history of science as shifting paradigms and scientific revolutions will not only enhance students' scientific literacy, but possibly enhance their willingness to pursue science education.; A review of the theoretical literature surrounding Kuhn, his followers and his critics, suggest the framework is still salient among educators. A review of the empirical literature and some educational practices suggests that educators see this approach to be effective, especially when the framework and case materials are carefully crafted. The empirical literature also suggests that there is a gap between the prescribed standards (national and state) for teaching the history of science, and actual classroom practice. The Kuhnian framework shows promise for bridging this gap.; The dissertation then uses a case history of the discovery of electromagnetic radiation by Faraday, Maxwell, and Hertz et al., culminating in the development wireless telegraphy by Marconi, making possible radio, television, radar, and other contemporary technologies. The dissertation concludes by noting that the use of history as an arena for understanding science, in some way resembles the concept of “reflective thinking”, which is often utilized as a framework for educating new teachers, and for their use in the classroom.
机译:本文探讨了使用库恩框架来增强历史在科学教学中的应用的可能性。值得注意的是,库恩式的“革命”和“正常”科学框架为理科学生提供了一个简化而又说明性的框架,同时也使人们可以展示科学家的日常生活。该作品不仅关注科学英雄,还研究了“正常”科学家的重要工作及其与“革命”科学家的相互作用。有人认为,在此框架内看到科学家的日常生活可以向理科学生展示科学家工作看似简单的贡献所产生的深远影响。此外,应当指出,将科学史视为不断变化的范式和科学革命,不仅会增强学生的科学素养,而且可能会增强他们进行科学教育的意愿。对有关库恩,他的追随者和他的批评者的理论文献的回顾表明,该框架在教育者中仍然很重要。对经验文献和一些教育实践的回顾表明,教育工作者认为这种方法是有效的,尤其是在精心设计框架和案例材料的情况下。经验文献还表明,科学史教学的规定标准(国家和州)与实际课堂实践之间存在差距。 Kuhnian框架显示出弥合这一差距的希望。然后,论文使用了法拉第,麦克斯韦和赫兹等人发现电磁辐射的案例历史,并以马可尼开发的无线电报告终,从而使无线电,电视,雷达和其他当代技术成为可能。论文的结论是指出,将历史作为理解科学的场所在某种程度上类似于“反思性思维”的概念,“反思性思维”通常被用作教育新教师以及在教室中使用的框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号