首页> 外文学位 >Why do states do what they do? A comparative analysis of national interest formation in China and India.
【24h】

Why do states do what they do? A comparative analysis of national interest formation in China and India.

机译:为什么国家要做什么?中国和印度国家利益形成的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The national interest remains among the most commonly utilized phrases in the vocabulary of international relations. There are, however, few empirical studies of the process by which elites formulate their perceptions of national interests. China and India today are both seeking military modernization and economic reforms, but these policies spring from markedly different perceptions of the national interest of each nation.; This research investigates the process by which perceptions of the national interest are formed in China and India, and provides implications for national interest formation elsewhere. The data for perceptions of the national interest are derived from 110 formal elite interviews in China and India, as well as documents and literature. The respondents' perceptions concerning the purpose of defense modernization and economic reforms reveal the perceived hierarchy of national interests in each country.; National interests in China and India are primarily determined by perceptions of internal and external threats to state sovereignty. Factors such as national unity, territorial integrity, and globalization all combine to create pressures on the state. In addition, political institutions play an integral role in determining which threats are most critical. Chinese respondents perceived territorial sovereignty and state unity to be the primary national interests. The existence of a rigid political system in China meant that failure to protect territory and unity could risk the legitimacy of the Communist Party and state. For China, preservation of state unity and Party legitimacy became vital for state survival.; Indian respondents believed globalization posed the greatest threat to state sovereignty, and the primary national interest was protecting sovereignty in the economic and political spheres. The legitimacy of the Indian political system was not of concern, and respondents credited democratic institutions with providing remarkable political stability. Thus, the divergences in national interest formation can be traced back to the differences in the political systems. The Party-State structure in China and democracy in India create different imperatives for the ranking of national interests. The different processes of national interest formation between China and India ultimately influence the intentions of these nations as they play increasingly prominent roles in the international system.
机译:国家利益仍然是国际关系词汇中最常用的短语之一。但是,很少有关于精英表达他们对国家利益的看法的过程的实证研究。今天的中国和印度都在寻求军事现代化和经济改革,但是这些政策源于对每个国家的国家利益的明显不同的看法。这项研究调查了在中国和印度形成国家利益的过程,并为其他地方的国家利益形成提供了启示。对国家利益的感知数据来自中国和印度的110次正式精英访谈以及文件和文献。受访者对国防现代化和经济改革的目的的看法揭示了每个国家对国家利益的感知等级。中国和印度的国家利益主要取决于对国家主权的内部和外部威胁的认识。国家统一,领土完整和全球化等因素共同对国家造成压力。此外,政治机构在确定哪些威胁最关键方面起着不可或缺的作用。中国受访者认为领土主权和国家统一是首要的国家利益。中国僵化的政治制度的存在意味着未能保护领土和统一可能会冒着共产党和国家合法性的风险。对于中国而言,维护国家统一和党的合法性对于国家生存至关重要。印度受访者认为,全球化对国家主权构成最大威胁,而国家的首要利益是在经济和政治领域保护主权。印度政治制度的合法性并不令人关注,受访者称赞民主机构提供了出色的政治稳定性。因此,国家利益形成的差异可以追溯到政治制度的差异。中国的党-国家结构和印度的民主制度对国家利益的排名提出了不同的要求。中国和印度之间不同的国家利益形成过程最终会影响这些国家的意图,因为它们在国际体系中发挥着越来越重要的作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lal, Rollie.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 245 p.
  • 总页数 245
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号