首页> 外文学位 >Understanding change: An intellectual and practical study of military innovation [and] U.S. Army antiaircraft artillery and the battle for legitimacy, 1917--1945.
【24h】

Understanding change: An intellectual and practical study of military innovation [and] U.S. Army antiaircraft artillery and the battle for legitimacy, 1917--1945.

机译:了解变化:对军事创新[和]美国陆军防空炮兵和争取合法性的战斗的理性和实践研究,1917-1945年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Military organizations are normally quite resistant to change the way they operate. For a number of complex reasons militaries have failed on occasion to anticipate, learn, and adapt to changes in the conduct of warfare. This work examines the anatomy of change and argues that achieving successful organizational change in the military results from garnering external support and winning internal consensus. It counters recent scholarship that maintains the interwar army was a hidebound organization, unable to overcome internal power struggles and achieve necessary reforms. It begins with an intellectual analysis of how and why organizational change occurs, examines the nature of revolutionary and evolutionary change, and offers one approach toward achieving lasting, meaningful modernization and innovation in the military.; This work then examines the development of American antiaircraft artillery as a case study to illuminate the earlier discussion of theory as it relates to organizational and institutional change. Beginning in World War I and tracing the evolution of antiaircraft artillery through the interwar period and World War II, this study highlights the nonlinear nature of change and the influence of technology, strategy, resources, and organizational politics on efforts to improve the American Army's ability to defend against air attack. It also provides valuable insight into the ability of the Army to learn from its mistakes and adapt to changing combat situations. From the Interwar development of doctrine to the prewar production of new weapons, the antiaircraft artillery establishment accepted limited, incremental success and did not sacrifice its overall development on the altar of sweeping reform. National military policy, strategy, operations, and tactics are analyzed as the expanding antiaircraft establishment defended the Panama Canal, Pearl Harbor, and the Philippines from Japanese attack, and fought through stubborn German resistance at Kasserine Pass, on Normandy, and at the Remagen Bridge. Battles against the V-1 cruise missile, the V-2 ballistic missile, and Japanese kamikaze pilots tested antiaircraft units' training and adaptability, while fire support missions to assist infantry and armor units brought the antiaircraft artillery independence from the Coast Artillery Corps and acceptance as a member of the family of arms.
机译:军事组织通常抵制改变其运作方式。由于许多复杂的原因,军队有时无法预见,学习和适应战争行为的变化。这项工作研究了变化的解剖结构,并认为,获得外部支持和赢得内部共识可以在军事上成功实现组织变革。它反驳了最近的奖学金,即维持两次世界大战的军队是一个隐蔽的组织,无法克服内部权力斗争并无法进行必要的改革。它从对组织变革如何以及为什么发生的理性分析开始,考察了革命性和进化性变革的本质,并提供了一种在军事领域实现持久,有意义的现代化和创新的方法。然后,这项工作以案例研究的形式考察了美国高射炮的发展,以阐明有关组织和机构变革的理论的早期讨论。这项研究从第一次世界大战开始,一直到第二次世界大战期间和第二次世界大战期间追溯高射炮的发展历程,强调了变革的非线性性质以及技术,战略,资源和组织政治对提高美国陆军能力的努力的影响防御空袭。它还为军队从错误中学习并适应不断变化的战斗情况提供了宝贵的见识。从两次战争之间的学说发展到战前生产新武器,高射炮兵部队接受了有限的,渐进的成功,并没有在全面改革的祭坛上牺牲其总体发展。分析了不断扩大的防空设施,保卫了巴拿马运河,珍珠港和菲律宾,使其免受日军的攻击,并抵抗了德国的顽强抵抗,在卡西林山口,诺曼底和雷马根桥上对国家军事政策,战略,作战和战术进行了分析。与V-1巡航导弹,V-2弹道导弹和日本神风敢死队的战斗测试了防空单位的训练和适应性,同时协助步兵和装甲单位的火力支援使防空炮兵从海岸炮兵团获得独立并被接受作为武器家族的一员。

著录项

  • 作者

    Greenwald, Bryon E.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 History United States.; Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 529 p.
  • 总页数 529
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 美洲史;政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号