首页> 外文学位 >Improvising politics: Jazz, democracy, and challenging the politics of mutual respect.
【24h】

Improvising politics: Jazz, democracy, and challenging the politics of mutual respect.

机译:改善政治:爵士乐,民主和挑战相互尊重的政治。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My dissertation, “Improvising Politics: Jazz, Democracy, and Challenging the Politics of Mutual Respect,” is an interpretive study of deliberative democracy, jazz theory, and the political virtue of mutual respect. Leading democratic theory generally defines mutual respect as a rule that discourages treating people as ends and instead appeals to common humanity. The problem with this requirement is that racialized patterns of character and moral assessments have not fully yielded to appeals to common humanity. Moreover, mutual respect as a precondition tends to be imposed and locks citizens into certain norms of behavior to guarantee that their positions will be recognized and taken seriously. Even correctives to deliberative theories seek to preserve deliberation by encouraging people to pay attention, but they offer no mechanism for citizens to respond to what has been heard in deliberation. My dissertation deviates from traditional analyses of deliberative democracy by elaborating a theory of democratic engagement based upon improvisation.; Overall my dissertation suggests the need for a new and unconventional approach to understand how citizens engage each other. I define improvisation as an orientation towards politics, that occurs when citizens open themselves up to surprise, to influence from others, after agreeing to work within a framework where the primary constraint is that they agree to respond to what has been heard from fellow citizens. I argue that improvising politics can be an intentional approach to political interaction (not merely “spontaneous”), one that encourages citizens to build skills in the areas of hearing, acknowledging, responding to what has been heard, practicing compassion, and depending on others. This approach can offer deeper insight into democratic theory by strengthening the potential to explain democratic engagement in the twenty-first century. It also suggests a different “structure” of sorts, where each participant has a chance to lead and learns how to play a supportive role. I maintain that citizens are capable of improvising, whether it is at the level of everyday discussion or in more formal settings. I examine examples from the Civil Rights Movement and electronic organizing to illustrate ways that improvisation has already made its appearance in politics.
机译:我的论文“改善政治:爵士,民主和挑战相互尊重的政治”,是对协商民主,爵士理论和相互尊重的政治美德的解释性研究。领先的民主理论通常将相互尊重定义为一条规则,该规则不鼓励将人们视为最终目标,而是诉诸于普通人类。这项要求的问题在于,人格化和道德评估的种族化模式尚未完全屈服于呼吁普通人类。而且,倾向于以相互尊重为前提,并把公民锁定在某些行为规范中,以保证其立场将得到承认和认真对待。甚至对审议理论的矫正也试图通过鼓励人们注意来保持审议,但是它们没有为公民提供对审议中所听到的内容做出回应的机制。我的论文通过阐述基于即兴创作的民主参与理论而偏离了传统的协商民主分析。总的来说,我的论文表明需要一种新的,非常规的方法来理解公民之间的互动。我将即兴定义为一种政治取向,即当公民同意在一个主要约束条件是他们同意回应同胞听到的消息的框架内工作后,对自己敞开心surprise,受到他人的影响。我认为,即兴政治可以是政治互动的一种有意方法(不仅仅是“自发”),它鼓励公民在听觉,承认,回应所听到的事物,实行同情心以及依赖他人方面建立技能。通过加强解释二十一世纪民主参与的潜力,这种方法可以提供对民主理论的更深入的了解。它还提出了不同的“结构”,每个参与者都有机会领导并学习如何发挥支持作用。我坚持认为,无论是在日常讨论中还是在更正式的场合中,公民都有能力即兴创作。我研究了民权运动和电子组织的例子,以说明即兴政治已经出现在政治中的方式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gregory, Sarita McCoy.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Chicago.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; American Studies.; Black Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 132 p.
  • 总页数 132
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;人类学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号