首页> 外文学位 >Alternative thinking on governance: A critical analysis of structure and uncertainty in embedding good governance at the local level in Tanzania.
【24h】

Alternative thinking on governance: A critical analysis of structure and uncertainty in embedding good governance at the local level in Tanzania.

机译:关于治理的替代性思维:对坦桑尼亚地方一级实施善治的结构和不确定性的批判性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

One of the most challenging questions that a political comparativist can grapple with in today's world is: Why do some countries and their systems of governance fail while others succeed? As a student of comparative politics, I have been grappling with a similar question for some time now: What is wrong with development initiatives in Africa? This is the major question motivating my research. In this dissertation, I apply a new institutional approach to an exploration and analysis of the fundamental institutional issues of the current local governance system in Tanzania. Specifically, this study investigates and reflects on the relationship between institutions and governance in local political settings and analyzes the impacts of institutional factors on good governance, particularly at the local level, in Tanzania. Of particular importance in this study is the precise analysis that I provide of contemporary governing practices in Tanzania since the inception of the Local Government Reform Program (LGRP) in 2000. This is used to compare current governing practices to the conceptions of how they were expected work after the end of the program in June 2008.;I have argued in this dissertation that Tanzania's development outcomes (good governance and reduction of systemic poverty) are greatly influenced by the country's institutions of governance. However, my research findings show that the role of institutions that are deemed necessary for the achievement of local development goals and good governance in Tanzania has become severely simplified if not forgotten. Drawing on the discussions and findings of each chapter in this dissertation, I came to the conclusion that when the system of governance is malfunctioning, then something must be wrong with its institutional mechanisms. This is what I have described in this study as "alternative thinking on governance".;I used documentary research to identify fundamental issues in local governance in Tanzania. From this checklist, a selected few of the problems, ones that are common to all local government authorities (LGAs), were chosen as the foci of the research. Then, in order to explore the relationship between the selected problems and the institutional framework, a case study of four LGAs in Tanzania was employed.
机译:政治比较主义者在当今世界中可以应对的最具挑战性的问题之一是:为什么有些国家及其治理体系会失败,而另一些国家却会成功?作为比较政治学的学生,一段时间以来,我一直在努力解决一个类似的问题:非洲的发展计划有什么问题?这是激励我研究的主要问题。在本文中,我将采用一种新的制度方法来探索和分析坦桑尼亚当前地方治理体系的基本制度问题。具体而言,本研究调查并反思了当地政治环境中制度与治理之间的关系,并分析了制度因素对善治的影响,特别是坦桑尼亚地方一级的善治。在这项研究中特别重要的是,自2000年地方政府改革计划(LGRP)实施以来,我对坦桑尼亚的当代执政实践进行了精确的分析。该分析用于将当前的执政实践与预期的构想进行比较。在该计划于2008年6月结束后开展工作。;我在这篇论文中指出,坦桑尼亚的发展成果(良好的治理和减少的系统性贫困)在很大程度上受到该国治理机构的影响。但是,我的研究结果表明,如果不能忘记,坦桑尼亚实现地方发展目标和善政所必需的机构的作用已被大大简化。利用本文每一章的讨论和发现,我得出的结论是,当治理体系失灵时,其制度机制必定存在问题。这就是我在本研究中所描述的“治理的替代思维”。我使用文献研究来确定坦桑尼亚地方治理的基本问题。从该清单中,选择了一些问题,这些问题是所有地方政府当局(LGAs)共有的,是本研究的重点。然后,为了探索所选择的问题与体制框架之间的关系,以坦桑尼亚的四个地方政府协定为例。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Alberta (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Alberta (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 272 p.
  • 总页数 272
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 老年病学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号