This work explores the religious dimensions of American foreign policy in the early Cold War years. Twentieth-century American Protestantism, American diplomacy, and the Truman and Eisenhower Administrations comprise the main subjects of this dissertation, which is based on research in the archives of American religious and political leaders and institutions, as well as analysis of published sources.; Besides the well established political, economic, and security concerns that motivated the United States' opposition to the Soviet Union, a simple yet powerful set of theological convictions also determined the United States' decision to resist Soviet expansion. In particular, Presidents Harry S. Truman and Dwight D. Eisenhower believed that human rights and freedoms were endowed by God, that God had called the United States to play a special role in the world, and that Soviet communism was especially evil because of its atheism and its enmity to all religious faith.; American Protestant churches experienced many divisions during this time. Internal differences over theology and politics hindered the ability of Protestant leaders to influence the nation's public discourse or the shape of American foreign policy. Frustrated at these internecine disputes, Truman and Eisenhower attempted instead to construct a new civil religion, doctrinally inclusive and militantly anticommunist.; This public theology defined the American identity in spiritual terms, and determined the American role in the world. It was used to mobilize domestic support for Cold War measures, to determine the strategic boundaries of containment, to appeal to people of all religious faiths around the world to form a united spiritual front against communism, and to undermine the authority of communist governments within their own countries.; A series of case studies involving the two presidents as well as other political leaders, including Congressman Walter Judd, Senator H. Alexander Smith, and Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, demonstrates the various ways in which diplomatic theology informed American foreign policy. Taken together, they illustrate how and why for many Americans, the Cold War was a religious war.
展开▼
机译:这项工作探讨了冷战初期美国外交政策的宗教层面。二十世纪的美国新教,美国外交以及杜鲁门和艾森豪威尔政府是本论文的主要主题,其基础是对美国宗教和政治领袖和机构档案的研究,以及对已发表资料的分析。除了引起美国反对苏联的公认的政治,经济和安全问题外,一系列简单而有力的神学信念也决定了美国抵制苏维埃扩张的决定。特别是,哈里·杜鲁门(Harry S. Truman)总统和艾森豪威尔(Dwight D. Eisenhower)总统认为人权和自由是上帝赋予的,上帝呼吁美国在世界上发挥特殊作用,苏联共产主义尤其邪恶,因为它无神论及其对所有宗教信仰的仇恨。美国新教教会在这段时间经历了许多分裂。神学和政治上的内部分歧阻碍了新教领袖影响国家公开言论或美国外交政策形式的能力。杜鲁门和艾森豪威尔对这些相互之间的纠纷感到沮丧,反而试图建立一种新的公民宗教,从原则上讲是包容性的并且是激进的反共主义者。这种公共神学从精神上定义了美国人的身份,并决定了美国人在世界上的作用。它被用来动员国内对冷战措施的支持,确定遏制的战略边界,呼吁世界各地所有宗教信仰的人们组成反对共产主义的统一精神阵线,并破坏共产主义政府在其内部的权威。本国。涉及两位总统和其他政治领导人的一系列案例研究,包括国会议员沃尔特·贾德,参议员H·亚历山大·史密斯和国务卿约翰·福斯特·杜勒斯,都展示了外交神学为美国外交政策提供信息的各种方式。总之,它们说明了对许多美国人来说,冷战是一场宗教战争的方式和原因。
展开▼