首页> 外文学位 >The development of benchmarks and the selection of appropriate methods to assess technological literacy portion of the natural science and living technology curriculum as required by the 2000 National Curriculum Guidelines of the Republic of China (Taiwan).
【24h】

The development of benchmarks and the selection of appropriate methods to assess technological literacy portion of the natural science and living technology curriculum as required by the 2000 National Curriculum Guidelines of the Republic of China (Taiwan).

机译:根据《中华民国2000年国家课程指南》(台湾)的要求,开发基准并选择适当的方法来评估自然科学和生活技术课程的技术素养部分。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of the study is to identify the essential benchmarks of technological literacy to be required of 9th graders in Taiwan, and to determine assessment methods for these benchmarks. Its results, the clarification of the benchmarks of technological literacy as well as the appropriate assessment tasks, provide a foundation for what technological literacy means to technology teachers and students in Taiwan, and offer assistance to their teaching and learning, measuring achievement, and evaluating programs.; The Delphi technique was employed in the study that consists of one initial survey and three reiterative questionnaires. Twenty-four panelists, all technology education professionals with extensive teaching and research experience in Taiwan, participated in the study. The initial survey, Delphi probe, was designed to collect a provisional list of benchmarks and assessment tasks for measuring technological literacy. A list of 105 benchmarks and five assessment tasks was compiled from the responses to the initial survey.; In the three rounds of the Delphi process, panel members responded to rate the importance of each benchmark using a four-point Likert scale. The importance and level of agreement of each benchmark was then examined by calculating the arithmetic mean, mode, standard deviation, range, and data distribution. The criteria for lack of consensus include: a standard deviation of .780 or higher and an agreement level of 60% or lower. Those items without consensus were maintained into the next questionnaire for further inquiry.; Started from the second-round questionnaire, participants were shown the mean score of each benchmark with his or her rating from the previous round. With this information, they could reconsider their rating when filling out the new questionnaire.; Through the three rounds of Delphi studies, 60 out of 105 benchmarks were identified as important benchmarks. Their level of importance was analyzed and thematic connections between the benchmarks were explored. Furthermore, they were presented in five categories: Understanding of Technology, Inquiry and Analytical Skills, Communication Skills, Design and Build Skills, and Application and Problem Solving Skills.
机译:该研究的目的是确定台湾9年级学生所需的基本技术素养基准,并确定这些基准的评估方法。其结果,澄清了技术素养的基准以及适当的评估任务,为台湾的技术师生对技术素养意味着什么奠定了基础,并为他们的教与学,衡量成绩和评估计划提供了帮助。;该研究采用了德尔菲技术,该技术由一项初步调查和三份重复调查问卷组成。二十四位来自台湾,在台湾具有丰富教学和研究经验的技术教育专业人士参加了此项研究。最初的调查是Delphi探针,旨在收集用于衡量技术素养的基准和评估任务的临时列表。从对初始调查的答复中汇总了105个基准和5个评估任务的清单。在德尔福过程的三轮中,小组成员使用李克特四分制评分表对每个基准的重要性进行了评分。然后,通过计算算术平均值,模式,标准差,范围和数据分布,检查每个基准的重要性和一致程度。缺乏共识的标准包括:标准偏差为.780或更高,协议水平为60%或更低。这些未达成共识的项目将保留在下一个调查表中,以进行进一步查询。从第二轮问卷调查开始,向参与者显示每个基准的平均分数及其上一轮的评分。有了这些信息,他们可以在填写新问卷时重新考虑他们的评分。通过三轮Delphi研究,在105个基准中确定了60个为重要基准。分析了它们的重要性,并探讨了基准之间的主题联系。此外,它们分为五个类别:对技术的理解,查询和分析技能,沟通技能,设计和建造技能以及应用和解决问题技能。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wang, Kung Fu Sunny.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Education Technology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 288 p.
  • 总页数 288
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 T-4;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号