首页> 外文学位 >Reconstructing Houses: Early Village Social Organization in Prince Rupert Harbour, British Columbia.
【24h】

Reconstructing Houses: Early Village Social Organization in Prince Rupert Harbour, British Columbia.

机译:房屋重建:不列颠哥伦比亚省鲁珀特王子港的早期乡村社会组织。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation, I investigate the nature of social relations on the northern Northwest Coast during the Late Middle Period (500 BC to AD 500) through the rubric of House Societies as defined by Levi-Strauss (1982). In House Societies, corporate groups hold estates and wealth that are transmitted from one generation to the next. Houses were, and still are, the fundamental organizing principle in Tsimshian society. In the 19th century, Houses were central to systems of property ownership and social ranking. The antiquity of this institution however, is not clear. In this study, I ask whether Houses existed in the past in the Prince Rupert area and if so, what implications they might have had on social and economic relations. To investigate this question, I excavated two house depressions at GbTo-77, a small village site in Prince Rupert Harbour and considered whether evidence existed for long-term investment in place, the transmission of dwellings across multiple generations, and for owned estates or resource locations.;The results suggested that one house depression (house D) showed some evidence for house reconstruction and maintenance, but over a relatively short period of time, particularly in comparison to other locations across the Northwest Coast. A second house depression, however, may have been used intermittently, or for an even shorter period of time than house D; no evidence was found for continuity between occupations or long-term investment in architecture. Faunal remains from both house depressions were very small and could not be reliably used to infer differences in owned resource locations. As such, the results of this study indicate that the house depressions at GbTo-77 likely do not represent Houses. These results are significant because archaeologists have often assumed that the house depressions forming organized, rowed villages, such as GbTo-77, are the remnants of Houses or incipient Houses.;I explored also how architectural, stratigraphic and faunal evidence at GbTo-77 compared with these data at four other village sites in Prince Rupert Harbour. Few other house depressions were excavated sufficiently in order to adequately compare architecture remains between villages. The comparison of faunal remains between village sites in Prince Rupert Harbour, however, showed that there may have been important differences between villages in terms of economic systems, particularly in terms of salmon abundance, when compared with other fish taxa. The most significant differences in abundance were observed within column, bulk and auger samples (equal volume samples), indicating the importance of using small mesh screens (<2.8 mm) in faunal analyses. These data suggest that villages may have exerted control over important resource locations. The extent to which this control, or ownership, might reflect differences between houses, rather than villages, is not entirely clear for the Late Middle Period villages. I also observed significant differences in terms of shellfish composition at each village site. Variability in local resources may relate primarily to the precise location of these villages within the harbour, but may also have implications for our understanding of pre-contact land tenure practices in Prince Rupert Harbour.
机译:在这篇论文中,我通过列维·斯特劳斯(Levi-Strauss,1982)所定义的众议院社团的标题研究了中后期(公元前500年至公元500年)西北海岸北部社会关系的性质。在众议院社团中,公司集团持有的遗产和财富是一代代传给下一代的。在过去的今天,房屋一直是突尼斯社会的基本组织原则。在19世纪,房屋是财产所有权和社会地位系统的核心。但是,这个机构的上古时期还不清楚。在这项研究中,我问过去在鲁珀特王子港地区是否存在众议院,如果存在,它们对社会和经济关系可能产生什么影响。为了调查这个问题,我在GbTo-77(鲁珀特王子港的一个小村庄)发掘了两个房屋洼地,并考虑是否存在长期投资到位,多代人的住房转让以及自有财产或资源的证据。结果表明,一个房屋凹陷(房屋D)显示了房屋重建和维护的一些证据,但在相对较短的时间内,尤其是与西北海岸的其他地区相比。但是,第二个房屋压抑可能已间歇使用,或使用的时间比房屋D短。没有证据表明职业之间的连续性或对建筑的长期投资。来自两个房屋洼地的动植物残骸很小,无法可靠地用来推断拥有资源位置的差异。因此,这项研究的结果表明,GbTo-77处的房屋凹陷可能不代表房屋。这些结果之所以有意义,是因为考古学家通常认为GbTo-77等有组织,成排的村庄形成的房屋洼地是房屋或初期房屋的残余。;我还探讨了GbTo-77的建筑,地层和动物区系证据如何比较这些数据来自鲁珀特王子港的其他四个村庄。为了充分比较村庄之间的建筑残骸,很少挖掘其他房屋洼地。比较鲁珀特王子港村庄地点之间的动物区系仍然比较,结果表明,与其他鱼类相比,村庄之间在经济制度方面,尤其是鲑鱼丰度方面存在重要差异。在柱,散装和螺旋钻样品(等体积样品)中观察到丰度的最大差异,表明在动物分析中使用小筛网(<2.8 mm)的重要性。这些数据表明,村庄可能已经控制了重要的资源位置。对于中后期的村庄,这种控制或所有权在多大程度上反映了房屋之间而不是村庄之间的差异,尚不完全清楚。我还观察到每个村庄站点的贝类成分存在显着差异。当地资源的变化可能主要与这些村庄在海港内的确切位置有关,但也可能对我们对鲁珀特王子港的土地接触前土地保有权做法的理解有影响。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Anthropology Archaeology.;Native American Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 397 p.
  • 总页数 397
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号