首页> 外文学位 >Unlikely comparison and the transdisciplinarity of comparative literature: The boundaries of gender, technoscience, literature and visual culture.
【24h】

Unlikely comparison and the transdisciplinarity of comparative literature: The boundaries of gender, technoscience, literature and visual culture.

机译:比较文学不可能进行比较和比较学科性:性别,技术科学,文学和视觉文化的界限。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dissertation argues that current shifts in the humanities provide opportunities to transform comparative literature into a more transdisciplinary field that more fully attends to the agencies of knowledge work. In particular, comparative literature should center the intersections of the humanities and sciences, and feminist technoscience approaches in particular, to theorize and pursue "unlikely comparisons" that shed light on current debates on difference, disciplinarity, narrative, and the changing role of literary studies and the humanities more broadly. To illustrate the role of feminist technoscience in making agency-aware unlikely comparisons, the dissertation considers the resonances between the paintings of Remedios Varo and the philosophy-physics of Karen Barad. It is then shown that cyberfeminist narratives about Ada Lovelace reveal that networks, time travel, and emergent behaviors are necessary models for understanding the multiple and complex connections between Ada Lovelace and today's digital women, and for understanding the agencies of knowledge work more generally. The dissertation then argues for a more transdisciplinary, comparative, and "polyrhythmic" undergraduate curriculum, providing specific proposals for coursework and pedagogical materials. The sum of these arguments demonstrate that further theorization of "unlikely comparison," directed by the central questions of feminist technoscience, would enable comparative literary studies to more fully engage with the pressures and possibilities of complex and rapidly changing political, ethical, and intellectual connections and responsibilities.
机译:论文认为,当前人文科学的转变为将比较文学转变为更加跨学科的领域提供了机会,从而更加充分地参与了知识工作。比较文学尤其应以人文与科学的交叉点为中心,特别是女性主义技术科学的方法,以理论化和追求“不太可能的比较”,从而为当前关于差异,学科性,叙事以及文学研究的作用变化的争论提供了启示。和更广泛的人文学科为了说明女权主义技术科学在进行不太可能进行代理意识的比较中的作用,本文考虑了Remedios Varo的绘画与Karen Barad的哲学物理学之间的共鸣。然后表明,关于Ada Lovelace的网络女权主义叙事表明,网络,时间旅行和突发行为是理解Ada Lovelace与当今数字女性之间多重和复杂联系以及更广泛地了解知识机构的必要模型。然后,论文主张建立一个更具跨学科性,比较性和“多节奏性”的本科课程,为课程工作和教学材料提供具体建议。这些论点的总和表明,在女权主义技术科学的核心问题的指导下,对“不太可能进行比较”的进一步理论化将使比较文学研究能够更充分地应对复杂而迅速变化的政治,伦理和思想联系的压力和可能性。和责任。

著录项

  • 作者

    Moll, Ellen Alyce Soo.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Maryland, College Park.;

  • 授予单位 University of Maryland, College Park.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.;Womens Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 276 p.
  • 总页数 276
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号