首页> 外文学位 >Resolving higher education's effectiveness dilemmas: A cultural analysis of stakeholder expectations.
【24h】

Resolving higher education's effectiveness dilemmas: A cultural analysis of stakeholder expectations.

机译:解决高等教育的有效性难题:对利益相关者期望的文化分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Higher education is "under fire" from policymakers, business leaders, and the public who are demanding accountability, improvement, and change. The academy's response has evoked charges of arrogance, insularity, and an unwillingness to be accountable or to change. The result has been frustration, resentment, and animosity for both policymakers and educators. In addition, this divide has inhibited productive dialogue and change. This study draws on the organizational effectiveness and neo-institutional theory literature to examine a set of policy-related documents produced by higher education stakeholders. Their goals and expectations for higher education and the cultural-cognitive characteristics of stakeholder groups that underlie their concept of effectiveness are explicated and compared in order to help resolve this dilemma. Results show that the conflict rests in fundamental differences in values, assumptions and beliefs between stakeholders. Higher education's external stakeholders are judging its effectiveness and setting expectations based on values and metrics that are largely incompatible with the nature of the academy but that are in line with contemporary U.S. sociocultural and economic ideology. Stakeholders within higher education see these effectiveness issues as best resolved internally in accordance with academic traditions, standards, and expertise. Demands originating externally are seen as potential threats to academic views and culture. Understanding the differing perspectives offers grounds for negotiation and illuminates implications for change in higher education. Recommendations for change are offered. These are general recommendations that focus on identifying and reconciling areas of disagreement and inclusion of all stakeholder voices. Specific methods of implementation are left to the professional judgment of practitioners who must apply them to particular settings and circumstances.
机译:决策者,企业领导者和公众对高等教育的要求正受到追捧,他们要求问责制,改进和变革。该学院的反应引起了自大,孤立和不愿承担责任或不愿改变的指控。结果是决策者和教育者都感到沮丧,不满和敌意。此外,这种鸿沟阻碍了富有成效的对话和变革。这项研究利用组织有效性和新制度理论文献来研究由高等教育利益相关者制作的一系列与政策相关的文件。阐述并比较了他们对高等教育的目标和期望以及利益相关者群体的文化认知特征,这些特征是其有效性概念的基础,以帮助解决这一难题。结果表明,冲突在于利益相关者之间价值观,假设和信念的根本差异。高等教育的外部利益相关者正在评估其有效性并根据与学院的性质基本不符但与当代美国社会文化和经济意识形态相一致的价值观和指标设定期望。高等教育领域的利益相关者认为,按照学术传统,标准和专业知识,这些有效性问题最好在内部得到解决。来自外部的需求被视为对学术观点和文化的潜在威胁。了解不同的观点为谈判提供了基础,并阐明了高等教育变革的意义。提供了更改建议。这些是一般性建议,着重于确定和协调不同意见和包容所有利益相关者声音的领域。具体的实施方法由实践者的专业判断,他们必须将其应用于特定的环境和情况。

著录项

  • 作者

    Leimer, Christina Lee.;

  • 作者单位

    Fielding Graduate University.;

  • 授予单位 Fielding Graduate University.;
  • 学科 Education Higher Education Administration.;Education Higher.;Education Policy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 188 p.
  • 总页数 188
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号