首页> 外文学位 >Transitions to economic democracy: Corporations, collective action, councils and codetermination in twentieth century Germany and South Africa.
【24h】

Transitions to economic democracy: Corporations, collective action, councils and codetermination in twentieth century Germany and South Africa.

机译:向经济民主的过渡:20世纪德国和南非的公司,集体行动,理事会和共同决定权。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation analyzes the process of class formation at the institutional level in twentieth century Germany and South Africa. Through an examination of the ways in which labor and employer organizations organize their interests in these countries, it interrogates sociological claims that employers permanently enjoy an organizing capacity greater than their employee counterparts. Arguing that the organization and articulation of interests should be understood within a transnational, comparative framework rather than a merely national one as corporatist literature suggests, the dissertation finds that in comparatively backward contexts, employers are bestowed with considerable short-term advantages over both potential competitors in their product markets and over their employees in the labor market. These advantages derive in large measure from the conditions in which large corporations in backward contexts enter the global political economy. In the longer term, however, the picture looks quite different.; The examples of the German coal and steel industry and the South African gold and diamonds industry show that large firms in these sectors were able successfully to combine their product and labor market advantages as a means of consolidating economic and political power. Through their respective dominant employers associations, they could further impose constraints on labor's free collective bargaining regionally and nationally.; The terms of these employer advantages, however, are highly contingent and unstable. In their violation of the norms of free organization, employers and their authoritarian state allies unintentionally foster more extensive forms of worker organization, while also politicizing labor's place in the social order. When such authoritarian coalitions weaken, employers are forced to cede to the demands of labor organizations that show an unusually high degree of organization compared with their counterparts in “older” industrialized nations. A further legacy of post-authoritarian democratization is a more fully articulated labor law in comparatively backward contexts that further strengthens labor movements' longer-term advantage over their employers.; Based on archival research, interviews, newspapers, and other printed sources, this dissertation engages in new ways of understanding German and South African developmental “peculiarity,” the role of associations in organizing employer and employee interests, the dynamics of labor movements, and their relation to democratization.
机译:本文分析了二十世纪德国和南非在制度层面上的阶级形成过程。通过研究劳工和雇主组织在这些国家的利益组织方式,它质疑了社会学上的主张,即雇主永久享有比雇员更大的组织能力。主张利益的组织和表达应在跨国的,比较性的框架内理解,而不是像社团主义文献所建议的那样仅是国家的框架,论文发现,在相对落后的背景下,与两个潜在竞争者相比,雇主被赋予了相当大的短期优势。在他们的产品市场中以及在劳动力市场中其雇员之上。这些优势很大程度上源于落后企业进入全球政治经济的条件。从长远来看,情况看起来大不相同。德国煤炭和钢铁业以及南非黄金和钻石业的例子表明,这些领域的大公司能够成功地结合其产品和劳动力市场优势,以巩固经济和政治实力。通过各自的主要雇主协会,他们可以进一步限制地区和全国范围内的劳工自由集体谈判。但是,这些用人单位的优待条件是高度偶然的且不稳定的。雇主及其威权国家盟友在违反自由组织准则的情况下,无意间培养了更广泛的工人组织形式,同时也使劳工在社会秩序中的地位政治化。当这种威权联盟削弱时,雇主被迫屈服于劳工组织的要求,这些劳工组织与“较旧”工业化国家的劳工组织相比,具有异常高的组织度。威权主义后民主化的另一个遗产是在相对落后的背景下制定了更加明确的劳动法,这进一步加强了工人运动相对于雇主的长期优势。基于档案研究,访谈,报纸和其他印刷资料,本论文采用了新的方式来理解德国和南非的发展“特殊性”,协会在组织用人单位和雇员利益方面的作用,劳工运动的动态及其变化。与民主化的关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lawrence, Andrew G.;

  • 作者单位

    City University of New York.;

  • 授予单位 City University of New York.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Sociology General.; History Modern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 375 p.
  • 总页数 375
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;社会学;现代史(1917年~);
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号