首页> 外文学位 >Minimalism: The problem of meaning (Ludwig Wittgenstein, Frank Stella, Jasper Johns).
【24h】

Minimalism: The problem of meaning (Ludwig Wittgenstein, Frank Stella, Jasper Johns).

机译:极简主义:意义问题(路德维希·维特根斯坦,弗兰克·斯特拉,贾斯珀·约翰斯)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the development of Minimalism in relation to the problem of meaning, particularly in connection with the philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein and Abstract Expressionism. Although Wittgenstein's philosophy is intrinsic to our historical understanding of Minimalism, the thesis argues that Minimalism developed not as a philosophical movement, but rather as technical question about ontological character of the painterly mark. Minimalism began as a question about painting. The thesis explains that the artworks produced between 1959 and 1962/63 were painterly investigations that converted Abstract Expressionism's model expressive content and painterly “style” into the problem of meaning and intention. Minimalism thus emerged not from a rejection of painting, but rather a confrontation with its source of value in the pictorial mark. Wittgenstein's importance, the thesis argues, emerges in relation to proto-Minimalist artwork, rather than the canonical Minimalist “specific object.” And it emerges in a non-uniform manner. Through an examination of early Minimalist artworks, we trace a series of influences that stem from Frank Stella and Jasper Johns to the Minimalists that bifurcate along the lines of two models of meaning: fact and meaning as use.; Fundamental to this examination is a critical understanding of those models of meaning, and the way in which artists and critics employed them to identify the Minimalist strategies, models of both semantic and technical potential. At the same time, the thesis shows that by 1965/66 Minimalism had become over-determined by these models and attempted to dispense with them altogether by introducing a technique they learned from painting, that is, repetition. Repetition had the advantage of posing an event without a model of meaning by virtue of the fact that there was no longer an isolated object as such to be taken up as a kind of assertion or proposition.; Finally, although the dissertation poses questions about the historical details of Minimalism's emergence, it also poses questions about models of meaning in general.
机译:本文探讨了极简主义在意义问题上的发展,特别是与路德维希·维特根斯坦哲学和抽象表现主义有关的发展。尽管维特根斯坦的哲学是我们对极简主义的历史理解所固有的,但论文认为极简主义并不是作为一种哲学运动而发展的,而是作为关于绘画标记本体论特征的技术性问题而发展的。极简主义最初是关于绘画的问题。本文解释说,1959年至1962/63年间创作的艺术品是绘画作品的研究,将抽象表现主义的模型表达内容和绘画“风格”转化为意义和意图问题。因此,极简主义不是来自对绘画的拒绝,而是与其在图片 mark 中的价值来源的对抗。论文认为,维特根斯坦的重要性与原始极简主义的艺术品有关,而不是与规范的极简主义的“特定物体”有关。而且它以不均匀的方式出现。通过对早期极简主义艺术品的考察,我们发现了一系列影响,这些影响源自弗兰克·斯特拉(Frank Stella)和贾斯珀·约翰斯(Jasper Johns)以及极简主义者,而极简主义者则沿两种意义模型分叉:事实和意义即使用。这项检查的基础是对意义模型的批判性理解,以及艺术家和评论家使用它们来识别极简主义策略,语义和技术潜力模型的方式。同时,论文表明,到1965/66年,极简主义已被这些模型过度确定,并试图通过引入他们从绘画中学到的技术(即重复)来完全放弃极简主义。重复的优势在于,由于不再有孤立的对象被当作一种断言或命题,因此在没有意义模型的情况下构成事件是很有利的。最后,尽管本文提出了关于极简主义出现的历史细节的问题,但也提出了关于意义模型的一般问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号