首页> 外文学位 >Literary Theory and Pedagogical Praxis: De Man, Barthes, Jameson, and 'Let Us Now Praise Famous Men'.
【24h】

Literary Theory and Pedagogical Praxis: De Man, Barthes, Jameson, and 'Let Us Now Praise Famous Men'.

机译:文学理论与教学实践:德曼,巴特斯,詹姆森和“让我们现在赞扬名人”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The following paper is an extended attempt to reclaim theory from the abstract. I believe that theory has regressed into itself since its heyday in the 1970s and 1980s, which makes it extremely hard to teach in practical ways and almost obsolete beyond a tiny sphere of the most advanced graduate classrooms. Though as critics and students of literature we are "theoretical" when we read, this is intrinsic and not foregrounded by the pedagogy in many English classes. Knowledge of "Theory"--the overarching epistemological paradigms that have been anthologized and canonized--is expected of upper level undergraduates and all graduate students, yet it is usually taught on its own, separated from the primary works all students of literature read and criticize. The effect of this is to create a vacuum from which theory is impossible to extricate, making its relevance to all but the smallest percentage of academics suspect, at best. But theory, for all of its purported difficulty and abstruseness, is actually an invaluable tool in the study of literature, especially because so much academic effort has been expended over the last forty years to explicate and expand the various schools. That it is taught almost as an aside--as something necessary for advancement in academia but not worth the time it takes in class to read and parse dense theorists like Lacan or Derrida--is a detriment to the future of literary studies; the Humanities in general will be asked more and more to defend itself against the onrushing budgetary concerns of education in the twenty-first century, and theory provides English departments a concrete way of measuring their worth against so-called "harder" disciplines, like the natural sciences, law, and medicine. For that to happen, though, we need to have pedagogical strategies that involve more than simply thrusting theory devoid of any literary context at students. The aim of this paper, then, is to show how theory can be used in the classroom with a primary work to deepen students' understanding of both the theory in question and also the primary work. The work I am using is James Agee's Let Us Now Praise Famous Men and the theoretical movements I examine are: 1) De Man and post-structuralism, 2) Barthes and structuralism, and 3) Jameson and Marxist postmodernism. I hope to show in a clear manner how pedagogy can harness these theories to improve the state of literary studies today.
机译:以下论文是从抽象中收回理论的扩展尝试。我认为,自1970年代和1980年代鼎盛时期以来,理论已经回归自身,这使得以实践方式进行教学变得极为困难,而在最先进的研究生教室的一小块范围之内,它几乎已经过时了。虽然作为评论家和文学学生,我们在阅读时是“理论的”,但这是内在的,并不是许多英语课中教学法所关注的。期望高年级本科生和所有研究生都对“理论”(即已被理论化和规范化的总体认识论范式)的知识,但通常是独立教授的,与所有文学专业阅读和学习的学生的主要著作分开批评。这样做的结果是造成真空,使理论无法从中解脱出来,充其量只与最小比例的学者怀疑有关,而与所有学者相关。但是,理论尽管据称困难重重,却实际上是文学研究中不可估量的工具,特别是因为在过去的40年中,人们花费了大量的学术努力来阐明和扩展各种流派。它几乎被当作一门课-这是学术界进步所必需的,但不值得在课堂上阅读和解析拉康或德里达等密集的理论家所花的时间,这不利于文学研究的未来;一般而言,人文学科将越来越受到捍卫,以抵御二十一世纪教育预算激增的担忧,而理论为英语系提供了一种具体的方法来衡量其所谓的“较难”学科的价值,例如自然科学,法律和医学。但是,要做到这一点,我们需要一种教学策略,不仅要在学生身上扎扎没有任何文学背景的理论,而且要涉及更多的内容。因此,本文的目的是展示如何在课堂教学中使用理论,以加深学生对相关理论和课堂教学的理解。我正在使用的作品是詹姆士·埃杰的《让我们现在赞美名人》,我考察的理论运动是:1)德曼与后结构主义; 2)巴特斯与结构主义;以及3)詹姆森与马克思主义的后现代主义。我希望以清晰的方式展示教学法如何利用这些理论来改善当今文学研究的状况。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dunham, Matthew Phillip.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Buffalo.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Buffalo.;
  • 学科 Language Linguistics.;Literature American.;Literature Modern.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 66 p.
  • 总页数 66
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号