首页> 外文学位 >Paths through interpretive territory: Two teachers' enactment of a technology -rich, inquiry -fostering science curriculum.
【24h】

Paths through interpretive territory: Two teachers' enactment of a technology -rich, inquiry -fostering science curriculum.

机译:进入解释性领域的途径:两位老师制定了一项技术丰富,探究性的科学课程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

New understandings about how people learn and constructivist pedagogy pose challenges for teachers. Science teachers face an additional challenge of developing inquiry-based pedagogy to foster complex reasoning skills. Theory provides only fuzzy guidance as to how constructivist or inquiry pedagogy can be accomplished in a wide variety of contexts and local constraints. This study contributes to the understanding of the development of constructivist, inquiry-based pedagogy by addressing the question: How do teachers interpret and enact a technology-rich, inquiry fostering science curricula for fifth grade students' biodiversity learning?.;This research is a case study of two teachers chosen as critical contrasting cases and represent differences across multiple criteria including: urban I suburban, teaching philosophy, and content preparation. The two fifth grade teachers each enacted BioKIDS: Kids' Inquiry in Diverse Species, an eight week curriculum focused on biodiversity. BioKIDS incorporates multiple learning technologies to support student learning including handheld computer software designed to help students collect field data, and a web-based resource for data on local animal species.;The results of this study indicate there are tensions teachers must struggle with when setting goals during enactment of inquiry science curricula. They must find a balance between an emphasis on authentic learning and authentic science, and between natural history and natural science. Authentic learning focuses on students' interests and lives; Authentic science focuses on students working with the tools and processes of science. Natural history focuses on the foundational skills in science of observation and classification. Natural science focuses on analytical science drawing on data to develop claims about the world. These two key tensions in teachers' goal setting were critical in defining and understanding differences in how teachers interpreted a curriculum to meet local context and constraints. This study also examined how teachers used technology and scientific inscriptions to support their goals. Implications for research in science education as well as design of curricula and technology are discussed.
机译:关于人们如何学习和建构主义教学法的新认识给教师带来了挑战。理科教师面临发展基于查询的教学法以培养复杂推理技能的另一挑战。对于在多种情况和局部限制下如何实现建构主义或探究式教学法,理论仅提供了模糊的指导。通过解决以下问题,本研究有助于理解建构主义的基于询问的教学法的发展:教师如何为五年级学生的生物多样性学习解释和制定技术含量高的,促进探究的科学课程?两名教师被选为关键对比案例的案例研究,代表了多个标准之间的差异,包括:城市I郊区,教学理念和内容准备。五年级的两位老师分别制定了BioKIDS:各种物种的儿童探究课程,该课程为期八周,主要针对生物多样性。 BioKIDS整合了多种学习技术以支持学生学习,包括旨在帮助学生收集田野数据的手持计算机软件以及用于获取本地动物物种数据的基于Web的资源。制定探究性科学课程时的目标。他们必须在重视真实学习和真实科学之间以及在自然历史和自然科学之间找到平衡。真正的学习注重学生的兴趣和生活;真实的科学侧重于使用科学的工具和过程的学生。自然史侧重于观察和分类科学的基本技能。自然科学专注于分析科学,它利用数据来发展关于世界的主张。教师目标设定中的这两个主要紧张关系对于定义和理解教师如何解释课程以满足当地情况和限制的差异至关重要。这项研究还研究了教师如何使用技术和科学铭文来支持他们的目标。讨论了对科学教育研究以及课程和技术设计的意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    McDonald, Scott Powell.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 Science education.;Educational technology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 198 p.
  • 总页数 198
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号