首页> 外文学位 >An integrative approach for municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill selection: A case study of O'ahu, Hawai'i.
【24h】

An integrative approach for municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill selection: A case study of O'ahu, Hawai'i.

机译:选择城市固体废物(MSW)垃圾填埋场的综合方法:以夏威夷瓦胡岛为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Landfill site selection is becoming increasingly difficult because of growing environmental and public health concerns and increasing scarcity of land for landfill construction. The City and County of Honolulu recently encountered difficulties in selecting a new landfill site. Developing a consistent and reasonable methodology is critically important.;This study develops an integrative methodology that links a geographic information system (GIS)-based analysis with an economic framework. The basic site selection framework minimizes social costs given constraints (exclusionary criteria based on rules and restrictions) using a two-part process: (i) a GIS-based screening of potential sites that satisfy constraints and (ii) benefits transfer methods (e.g., meta-analysis and mean transfer value approaches) that rank the selected sites according to social cost minimization. Meta-analysis models are evaluated in terms of sensitivity, validity, and reliability criteria. Sensitivity analysis examines aggregate values in response to changes in a selected variable (e.g., income, distance from target sites, discount rates, and lengths of landfill life). Validity requires statistical tests (e.g., t and sign rank tests) to examine differences between transfer values and original values. Reliability checks their similarity by utilizing an absolute percentage difference measure.;The GIS-based analysis was conducted on: (i) the City's 45 potential sites (Scenario 1) and (ii) the entire island of Oahu (Scenario 2). Together, both scenarios found 7 sites that satisfied the exclusionary criteria. Benefits transfer (BT) results indicate: (i) social costs are high, and (ii) social costs vary by target sites due to market conditions (e.g., income levels, housing values, population densities, and the number of households), different methods used (e.g., a contingent valuation method and a hedonic price method), different models used (e.g., meta-analysis (MA) models 1 and 2), and landfill life lengths. In terms of the sensitivity, validity, and reliability criteria, meta-analysis models are preferred to the mean transfer value approach. This study provides a potential method that evaluates and illustrates the process of site selection which can be applied to other site selection process (e.g., hazardous waste sites and incinerators). Further research is needed to analyze public preferences incorporating various individuals, groups, and minority populations.
机译:由于越来越多的环境和公共卫生问题以及用于填埋场建设的土地越来越少,填埋场的选择变得越来越困难。檀香山市和郡县最近在选择新的垃圾掩埋场时遇到困难。开发一致,合理的方法至关重要。本研究开发了一种集成方法,该方法将基于地理信息系统(GIS)的分析与经济框架联系起来。基本的选址框架使用两部分过程将给定的限制条件(基于规则和限制的排除标准)的社会成本降到最低:(i)基于GIS的满足限制条件的潜在场所筛选,以及(ii)利益转移方法(例如,元分析和均值转移值方法),根据社会成本最小化对选定的站点进行排名。荟萃分析模型根据敏感性,有效性和可靠性标准进行评估。敏感性分析会根据选定变量的变化(例如收入,距目标地点的距离,折现率和垃圾填埋场的寿命)检查汇总值。有效性需要统计测试(例如t和符号等级测试)来检查转移值和原始值之间的差异。可靠性通过使用绝对百分比差异度量来检查它们的相似性。基于GIS的分析是基于(i)纽约市的45个潜在站点(方案1)和(ii)整个瓦胡岛(方案2)。两种情况一起找到了满足排除标准的7个地点。收益转移(BT)结果表明:(i)社会成本很高,并且(ii)社会成本因市场条件(例如收入水平,房屋价值,人口密度和家庭数量)的不同而因目标地点而异使用的方法(例如,或有估值法和享乐价格法),使用的不同模型(例如,荟萃分析(MA)模型1和2)以及垃圾填埋场的寿命。就敏感性,有效性和可靠性标准而言,荟萃分析模型优于平均转移值方法。这项研究提供了一种评估和说明选址过程的潜在方法,该过程可以应用于其他选址过程(例如,危险废物场所和焚化炉)。需要进行进一步的研究来分析包含各种个人,群体和少数民族的公共偏好。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jung, Su Kwan.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Hawai'i at Manoa.;

  • 授予单位 University of Hawai'i at Manoa.;
  • 学科 Geodesy.;Environmental Management.;Environmental Sciences.;Economics Environmental.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 204 p.
  • 总页数 204
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号