首页> 外文学位 >From soft-sell to hardball: The evolution of the pro-Equal Rights Amendment campaign in South Carolina, 1972--1982.
【24h】

From soft-sell to hardball: The evolution of the pro-Equal Rights Amendment campaign in South Carolina, 1972--1982.

机译:从轻卖到强硬:1972--1982年南卡罗来纳州平等权利修正运动的演变。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

South Carolina did not ratify the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) when the women's movement was at its peak in the 1970s and early 1980s. This may not be particularly surprising based on the state's conservative record on women's rights. Historians have not thoroughly studied this state's involvement with the modern women's movement in their analysis of why the amendment did not pass in the United States. But South Carolina did have a strong ratification movement that consisted of optimistic and motivated activists who created a coalition of supportive organizations in the state. The ERA campaign in South Carolina was strong due of the hard work of this coalition, in which the state contingents of the League of Women Voters and the National Organization for Women took the lead. These supporters lobbied the legislature as wives and mothers, distancing themselves from radical stereotypes, to persuade legislators that the ERA would not harm women or take away their privileges, but would instead enhance their lives. The ERA's defeat in South Carolina was not always a given; in fact, there was a decade-long struggle over the issue that thrived both inside and outside of the state legislature. By the end of the 1970s, ERA supporters became frustrated with the growing body of opposition to the amendment and formed a new coalition that demanded equal rights much more directly. Anti-democratic conservative forces in the state legislature, however, were successful in stalling the ERA repeatedly until time ran out for ratification. This thesis traces the pro-ratification movement in South Carolina and its evolution through the years 1972 to 1982. Through focusing on supporters' tactics and strategies, it argues that there was a strong ratification movement in South Carolina and that its participants remained optimistic of its chances for ratification over the course of the decade. The ERA failed in South Carolina, but it was not due to a lack of effort on the part of supporters; rather, the conservative forces that dominated the legislature once again proved their skill in defeating progressive legislation in the Palmetto State.
机译:当妇女运动在1970年代和1980年代初期达到顶峰时,南卡罗来纳州未批准《平等权利修正案》。基于该州关于妇女权利的保守记录,这可能并不特别令人惊讶。历史学家在分析该修正案为何未在美国获得通过的原因时,并未对该州与现代妇女运动的参与进行彻底研究。但是南卡罗来纳州确实开展了强有力的批准运动,其中包括乐观的,积极进取的激进主义者,他们在该州建立了支持组织联盟。由于该联盟的辛勤工作,在南卡罗来纳州的ERA竞选活动很激烈,在该联盟中,女选民联盟和国家妇女组织的州特遣队率先。这些支持者游说立法机关作为妻子和母亲,摆脱了激进的刻板印象,说服立法者ERA不会伤害妇女或剥夺其特权,反而会改善他们的生活。 ERA在南卡罗来纳州的失败并不总是必然的。实际上,在州议会内部和外部蓬勃发展的问题上,已经进行了长达十年的斗争。到1970年代末期,ERA支持者对反对该修正案的反对团体日渐增多感到沮丧,并组建了一个新联盟,要求更加直接地享有平等权利。但是,州立立法机构的反民主保守势力成功地使ERA屡次停顿,直到时间待批准。本文追溯了南卡罗来纳州的批准前运动及其在1972年到1982年之间的演变。通过关注支持者的策略和策略,它认为南卡罗来纳州有很强的批准运动,并且其参与者仍然对其南卡罗来纳州持乐观态度。在过去十年中获得批准的机会。 ERA在南卡罗来纳州失败了,但这并不是由于支持者的努力而导致的。相反,主导立法机关的保守势力再次证明了他们击败帕尔梅托州进步立法的技巧。

著录项

  • 作者

    Foxworth, Laura.;

  • 作者单位

    University of South Carolina.;

  • 授予单位 University of South Carolina.;
  • 学科 History United States.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 50 p.
  • 总页数 50
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号