首页> 外文学位 >A comparative analysis of Traditional- versus Contract Activity Packaged- versus Tactual instruction on the achievement and attitudes of first year college students with literature in a core university course.
【24h】

A comparative analysis of Traditional- versus Contract Activity Packaged- versus Tactual instruction on the achievement and attitudes of first year college students with literature in a core university course.

机译:传统课程与合同活动,包装式与触觉教学对大学核心课程一年级大学生文学学习成绩和态度的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Typical college classrooms consist of auditory lectures with very little variety. Frequently, with large quantities of difficult material such as literature and writing assignments, undergraduate students become anxious about maintaining their grades. This problem is more prevalent with first-year students, who are still adjusting to the college experience. The purpose of this researcher was to investigate the effects of Traditional Instruction versus Contract Activity Packaged Instruction versus Tactual Resources on the achievement and attitudes of first-year undergraduate students with literature in a core university course. Participants in the sample included 75 first-year undergraduate students from a metropolitan university in New York.;The investigation spanned a six-week period, using a Counterbalanced Research Design. Each method was used for two weeks before the next method and chapter commenced. At the end of the study, all were administered the Comparative Values Scale (CVS) to assess their attitudes. The results indicated significant differences in attitude among both CAP instruction and Tactual Resources versus Traditional Instruction (p ≤ .05). Additionally, there was a significant difference with regard to gender when using the CAP versus the Traditional Instruction (p ≤ .05), with females scoring significantly higher than males on the assessment test.
机译:典型的大学教室包括听觉讲座,种类很少。通常,面对大量困难的材料,例如文学和写作作业,大学生渴望保持自己的成绩。对于仍在适应大学经历的一年级学生来说,这一问题更为普遍。该研究人员的目的是研究传统教学与合同活动,打包教学与触觉资源对大学核心课程中一年级本科生文学成就和态度的影响。样本的参与者包括来自纽约都市大学的75名一年级本科生。该研究使用平衡研究设计,为期六周。在开始下一方法和本章之前,每种方法都使用了两个星期。在研究结束时,所有患者均接受比较价值量表(CVS)评估其态度。结果表明,CAP指令和Tactual资源与传统指令相比在态度上存在显着差异(p≤.05)。此外,使用CAP与传统教学法相比,性别方面存在显着差异(p≤.05),在评估测试中,女性的得分明显高于男性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Allegretti, Rosette M.;

  • 作者单位

    St. John's University (New York), School of Education and Human Services.;

  • 授予单位 St. John's University (New York), School of Education and Human Services.;
  • 学科 Education Language and Literature.;Education Higher.;Education Instructional Design.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 179 p.
  • 总页数 179
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号