首页> 外文学位 >Establishing Quantum Monte Carlo and Hybrid Density Functional Theory as Benchmarking Tools for Complex Solids.
【24h】

Establishing Quantum Monte Carlo and Hybrid Density Functional Theory as Benchmarking Tools for Complex Solids.

机译:建立量子蒙特卡洛和混合密度泛函理论作为复杂固体的基准测试工具。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Quantum mechanics provides an exact description of microscopic matter, but predictions require a solution of the fundamental many-electron Schrodinger equation. Since an exact solution of Schrodinger's equation is intractable, several numerical methods have been developed to obtain approximate solutions. Currently, the two most successful methods are density functional theory (DFT) and quantum Monte Carlo (QMC). DFT is an exact theory which, which states that ground-state properties of a material can be obtained based on functionals of charge density alone. QMC is stochastic method which explicitly solves the many-body equation.;In practice, the DFT method has drawbacks due to the fact that the exchange-correlation functional is not known. A large number of approximate exchange-correlation functionals have been produced to accommodate for this deficiency. Conceptual systematic improvements known as "Jacob's Ladder" of functional approximations have been made to the standard local density approximation (LDA) and generalized gradient approximation (GGA). The traditional functionals have many known failures, such as failing to predict band gaps, silicon defect energies, and silica phase transitions. The newer generation functionals including meta-GGAs and hybrid functionals, such as the screened hybrid, HSE, have been developed to try to improve the flaws of lower-rung functionals. Overall, approximate functionals have generally had much success, but all functionals unpredictably vary in the quality and consistency of their predictions.;Often, a failure of one type of DFT functional can be fixed by simply identifying another DFT functional that best describes the system under study. Identifying the best functional for the job is a challenging task, particularly if there is no experimental measurement to compare against. Higher accuracy methods, such as QMC, which are vastly more computationally expensive, can be used to benchmark DFT functionals and identify those which work best for a material when experiment is lacking. If no DFT functional can perform adequately, then it is important to show more rigorous methods are capable of handling the task.;QMC is high accuracy alternative to DFT, but QMC is too computationally expensive to replace DFT. Hybrid DFT functionals appear to be a good compromise between QMC and standard DFT. Not many large scale computations have been done to test the feasibility or benchmark capability of either QMC or hybrid DFT for complex materials. This thesis presents three applications expanding the scope of QMC and hybrid DFT to large, scale complex materials. QMC computes accurate formation energies for single-, di-, and tri-silicon-self-interstitials. QMC combined with phonon energies from DFT provide the most accurate equations of state, phase boundaries, and elastic properties available for silica. The HSE DFT functional is shown to reproduce QMC results for both silicon defects and high pressure silica phases, establishing its benchmark accuracy compared to other functionals. Standard DFT is still the most efficient and useful for general computation. However, this thesis shows that QMC and hybrid DFT calculations can aid and evaluate shortcomings associated the exchange-correlation potential in DFT by offering a route to benchmark and improve reliability of standard, more efficient DFT predictions.
机译:量子力学提供了微观物质的精确描述,但是预测需要基本的多电子薛定inger方程的解。由于薛定inger方程的精确解是难解的,因此已经开发了几种数值方法来获得近似解。当前,两种最成功的方法是密度泛函理论(DFT)和量子蒙特卡洛(QMC)。 DFT是一种精确的理论,它指出可以仅基于电荷密度的函数来获得材料的基态特性。 QMC是一种随机方法,可以明确地解决多体方程。在实践中,DFT方法由于交换相关函数未知而具有缺点。为了适应这种缺陷,已经产生了大量近似的交换相关函数。对标准局部密度近似(LDA)和广义梯度近似(GGA)进行了功能性近似的概念性系统改进,称为“雅各布阶梯”。传统功能有许多已知的故障,例如无法预测带隙,硅缺陷能量和二氧化硅相变。已经开发了包括meta-GGA和混合功能(例如筛选的混合动力,HSE)在内的新一代功能,以尝试改善低阶功能的缺陷。总体而言,近似功能通常已经取得了很大的成功,但是所有功能的预测质量和一致性都出乎意料地有所不同;通常,一种DFT功能的故障可以通过简单地识别另一个最能描述系统的DFT功能来解决研究。确定最适合工作的功能是一项艰巨的任务,尤其是在没有实验测量可比较的情况下。精度更高的方法(例如QMC)在计算上更加昂贵,可用于基准测试DFT功能并在缺乏实验时确定最适合材料的功能。如果没有DFT功能可以充分执行,那么重要的是要显示出更严格的方法能够处理此任务。QMC是DFT的高精度替代品,但QMC在计算上过于昂贵,无法替代DFT。混合DFT功能似乎是QMC和标准DFT之间的良好折衷。尚未进行大规模的计算来测试QMC或混合DFT对复杂材料的可行性或基准能力。本文提出了三种应用,将QMC和混合DFT的范围扩展到了大型,复杂的材料。 QMC为单硅,双硅和三硅自填隙计算准确的地层能量。 QMC与DFT的声子能量相结合,可提供二氧化硅可用的最精确的状态,相边界和弹性特性方程。 HSE DFT功能显示出可再现硅缺陷和高压二氧化硅相的QMC结果,与其他功能相比可确立其基准精度。对于常规计算,标准DFT仍然是最有效和有用的。然而,本文表明,QMC和混合DFT计算可以通过提供基准测试路线并提高标准,更有效的DFT预测的可靠性,来帮助和评估与DFT中的交换相关电位相关的缺点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Driver, Kevin P.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Physics Quantum.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 206 p.
  • 总页数 206
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号