This thesis gives an account of wage claims' priority in the corporate bankruptcy regime of Canada and Peru, whose legal system and economic circumstances are quite different. Therefore, this thesis makes the normative argument that proposals for reform of wage claims' priority should not be considered in isolation, but must be assessed by reference to what can be called the "matrix of non-bankruptcy laws" relating to wage-earner protection, such as the labor market, directors' liability and employment insurance. In this respect, as the thesis demonstrates, Canada and Peru are actually different, even when their bankruptcy principles and the categories of their bankruptcy proceedings are almost the same. The thesis also makes a corresponding descriptive point, namely that the special priority Peruvian law gives to wage earner claims needs to be understood against the backdrop of Peruvian non-bankruptcy law which, in comparison with Canada, provides very little protection for workers.
展开▼
