首页> 外文学位 >Is poor symptom perception a predictor of poor adherence to controller medication among adults with asthma?
【24h】

Is poor symptom perception a predictor of poor adherence to controller medication among adults with asthma?

机译:不良的症状知觉是否可以预测哮喘成年人对控制药物的依从性差?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between asthma symptom perception, illness perception, and adherence to controller medications, and to identify explanatory variables for symptom perception accuracy and adherence rates. Teel's (1997) Symptom Interpretation Model (SIM) guided the study. One-hundred-twenty adults with asthma who were taking Advair as a controller medication, were enrolled in this cross-sectional descriptive study. Ninety-seven subjects, all patients of asthma/allergy specialty clinics, completed the four-week study protocol. Subjects completed daily diaries that assessed subjective symptom perception on two 10-point numeric rating scales (NRS), based on intensity and emotional response to symptoms, and measured peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) twice daily. Individual perceptual accuracy scores (PAS-intensity and PAS-emotion) were determined by correlations of the NRS scores with the PEFRs. Baseline measures included demographics, illness perception (Illness Perception Questionnaire - Revised), positive and negative affect (PANAS); and a single-item indicator of perceived asthma severity. Adherence was measured by the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS) and by Percent Advair (percent of doses taken/doses prescribed).;Results of an independent t-test comparing adherence rates of good versus poor perceivers (PAS-intensity) was not significant with either the Percent Advair or the MARS. However, results based on the PAS-emotion did demonstrate a significant difference between good and poor perceivers with Percent Advair as the dependent variable (t = -2.019, p = .047). The mean scores for Percent Advair, the pre-study MARS and the post-study MARS were consistently lower among the good perceivers than the poor perceivers. Multiple regression analyses reveal that years with asthma, illness identity (personal control and treatment efficacy, consequences, and timeline-cyclical subscales of the IPQ-R) and peak flow variability are significant explanatory variables for perceptual accuracy (PAS-intensity).;PAS-intensity and the IPQ-R consequence subscale emerged as explanatory variables for adherence when percent Advair was the criterion variable. When the MARS was used as the criterion for adherence, years with asthma, perceived asthma severity, personal control/treatment efficacy, age and positive affect emerged as explanatory variables.;Illness identity appears to inform perceptual accuracy and adherence rates as assessed. Clinical assessment of a patient's illness identity may help tailor interventions appropriate to the individual's needs.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查哮喘症状知觉,疾病知觉和对控制药物的依从性之间的关系,并确定症状知觉准确性和依从率的解释变量。 Teel(1997)的症状解释模型(SIM)指导了这项研究。这项横断面描述性研究纳入了120名以Advair作为控制药物的哮喘成人。所有哮喘/过敏专科诊所的患者共97名,完成了为期4周的研究方案。受试者完成每日日记,该日记根据强度和对症状的情绪反应,在两个10点数字评分量表(NRS)上评估主观症状知觉,并每天两次测量呼气峰值流速(PEFR)。通过NRS评分与PEFR的相关性来确定个人的感知准确度评分(PAS强度和PAS情绪)。基线指标包括人口统计学,疾病知觉(疾病知觉问卷-修订),正面和负面影响(PANAS);和感知哮喘严重程度的单项指标。依从性是通过药物依从性报告量表(MARS)和Advair百分比(已服用剂量/处方剂量的百分比)来衡量的;独立的t检验比较了好与不好的感知者的依从率(PAS强度)的结果与百分比Advair或MARS。但是,基于PAS情绪的结果确实显示了好感者与差感者之间的显着差异,Advair百分比为因变量(t = -2.019,p = .047)。在良好感知者中,Advair百分比,研究前MARS和研究后MARS的平均分数始终低于贫困感知者。多元回归分析表明,患有哮喘的年份,疾病特征(个人控制和治疗效果,后果以及IPQ-R的时间轴周期性分量表)和峰值流量变异性是感知准确性(PAS强度)的重要解释变量。 Advair百分比为标准变量时,强度和IPQ-R结果子量表作为依从性的解释变量出现。当将MARS用作依从性的标准时,哮喘的年限,所感知的哮喘严重程度,个人控制/治疗的效果,年龄和积极影响是解释性变量。疾病的身份似乎可以影响所评估的知觉准确性和依从性。对患者疾病身份的临床评估可能有助于定制适合个人需求的干预措施。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ohm, Ruth C.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 Nursing.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 210 p.
  • 总页数 210
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号