首页> 外文学位 >Confronting the development dilemma: Decentralized cooperation, governance and local responses to neoliberal reform in rural Senegal.
【24h】

Confronting the development dilemma: Decentralized cooperation, governance and local responses to neoliberal reform in rural Senegal.

机译:面对发展难题:塞内加尔农村地区对新自由主义改革的分散合作,治理和地方对策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation explores the implications of political and economic reform for local scale governance, defined primarily in terms of conflict management. A decade of neoliberal reform in Africa has revealed a fundamental dilemma; regime threatening conflict is associated with, and perhaps made more difficult to manage by, the very reforms deemed essential to sustained political and economic development. My research in Senegal demonstrates that some resolution of this dilemma involves local-international linkages which provide resources for the constitution of power essential to effective governance. More often, however, the required linkages are not established and local actors decry reforms intended to transfer power to newly designed local institutions as akin to having received an ""empty envelope."" Indigenous governance structures, presumed to be part of the solution to problems caused by the state's withdrawal, often prove inadequate. The work begins with an analysis of Senegal's 2000 presidential election, which constitutes the capstone of one of Africa's most celebrated cases of democratic capitalist transition. Following that, I draw on fieldwork in two rural sites to construct a decentralized cooperative model for local governance. The dynamics between political and economic reform, local resource-based conflict and the weakness of local self-governance all have profound implications for the constellation of local identities and conflicts associated with them. The type of conflict I explore in this research is that between herders and farmers, one well known throughout Sahelian Africa Subnational variation in the ability of local actors to execute greater mandates for self governance, and thus manage herder-farmer conflicts, is explained by the varied presence of international actors, and their resources, at the local level. This variation across locale is, partly at least, a function of historical processes of state development that have been characterized by their unevenness.
机译:本文探讨了政治和经济改革对地方规模治理的影响,主要从冲突管理的角度来定义。非洲十年的新自由主义改革暴露出一个根本的困境。威胁冲突的政权与那些被认为对持续的政治和经济发展至关重要的改革有关,也许使之更难管理。我在塞内加尔的研究表明,解决这一难题的方法涉及地方与国际的联系,这为有效治理必不可少的权力构成提供了资源。但是,更多时候,没有建立所需的联系,并且当地行为体谴责旨在将权力转移给新设计的地方机构的改革,就像收到了“空信封”一样。土著治理结构被认为是解决方案的一部分。由国家退出而引起的问题常常被证明是不够的。这项工作首先是对塞内加尔2000年总统大选的分析,它构成了非洲最著名的民主资本主义过渡案件之一的顶点。之后,我利用在两个农村站点的田野调查,构建了一个分散的地方治理合作模式。政治和经济改革之间的动态,基于地方资源的冲突以及地方自治的薄弱环节,都对地方身份和与其相关的冲突群产生了深远的影响。我在这项研究中探讨的冲突类型是牧民与农民之间的冲突,这是整个萨赫勒非洲国家以下地方公知的一种形式,即地方行为者执行更大的自治命令以管理牧民冲突的能力不同。国际行为者及其资源在地方层面的多样化存在。跨地区的这种变化至少部分是由于国家发展的历史过程的不均衡所致。

著录项

  • 作者

    O'Bannon, Brett R.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 175 p.
  • 总页数 175
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号