首页> 外文学位 >Urban/e forms of narrative consciousness: Concentric memory, eccentric madness and the making of the modern novel (Nikolai Gogol, Russia, Machado de Assis, Brazil, Victor Hugo, Marcel Proust, France).
【24h】

Urban/e forms of narrative consciousness: Concentric memory, eccentric madness and the making of the modern novel (Nikolai Gogol, Russia, Machado de Assis, Brazil, Victor Hugo, Marcel Proust, France).

机译:叙事意识的城市/电子形式:同心记忆,古怪的疯狂和现代小说的创作(尼古拉·高果,俄罗斯,马查多·德阿西斯,巴西,维克多·雨果,马塞尔·普鲁斯特,法国)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Modernist fiction confronts cultural crises concentrated in urban contexts and urbane consciousness through an anxiously recursive and digressive, dissembling and dissenting sentence, acutely aware of its period, but reaching beyond it through a paradoxical inward turn. This study discovers peculiar cultural correspondences in the schizophrenic displacement, paranoid projection, and pathological forms of memory that differently shape modernist narratives at the center and on the margins of Europe. It redefines the domain and dynamics of modernism (socio-historical, geographical, and generic) by focusing on the formative presence of the city and “citytext” in reflexive fictions by Hugo, Gogol, Dostoevsky, Machado de Assis, and Proust, for whose refractory narrators the city serves not only as pretext and context, but as a semiotic construct underpinning discrete modes of modern narrative construction and cultural self-definition.; I lay the groundwork for close readings in critical surveys of Paris, St. Petersburg and Rio citytexts. I draw out distinctions between concentric and eccentric cultural consciousness by considering how Bakhtin's theories of speech genres, dialogue, and literary chronotope, and the semiotics of the culture developed by writers such as Simmel and Benjamin, Schwarz, Toporov and Lotman intersect within and illumine self-consciously realized citytexts. I find that the alienation of the self and authorial anxieties characteristic of modernist fiction are generated in concentric narrative by creative but pathological remembering of the self and the city, and in eccentric narrative by the capacity to turn to imaginative uses urban displacement and doubling, digression and contradiction. While pursuing a social stylistics called for but not realized by Bakhtin, I contend against Bakhtin's reading of underground narrative, arguing for the creative capacities of cornered consciousness. I develop more fully his and Mário de Andrade's concepts of polyphonic narrative in the spatial terms delineated by Lotman and Schwarz, turning into the interiors explored by Brazilian and Russian modermsms.; My introductory and final chapters consider how these discrete pathological models of urbane consciousness elucidate modernist works by Bely, Barreto, Proust, Woolf and Pessoa. I trace a slanted line transecting twentieth-century Russian and Luso-Brazilian fictions by writers such as Lispector, Lins, Petrushevskaia, and Makine—narratives informed by complex intertextual dialogue, political reversals, cultural displacement, and sexual consciousness. I find the eccentric line encompassing, redefining the core, and the intercourse of “concentric memory” and “eccentric madness” capable of re-membering and re-placing the novel as a genre for our time.
机译:现代主义小说通过焦虑的递归和离题的,令人反感的和异议的句子,敏锐地意识到其时代,但却通过自相矛盾的内向转向超越了它,从而面对着集中在城市环境和城市意识中的文化危机。这项研究发现了精神分裂症的移位,偏执狂的投射和病理形式的记忆中独特的文化对应关系,它们在欧洲的中心和边缘不同地塑造了现代主义叙事。通过关注雨果,果戈尔,陀思妥耶夫斯基,马查多·德阿西斯和普鲁斯特的反身小说中城市和“城市文本”的形成性存在,它重新定义了现代主义(社会历史,地理和一般性)的领域和动态。耐心的叙述者,这座城市不仅充当借口和语境,而且还作为符号学结构,支撑现代叙事建构和文化自定义的离散模式。我为巴黎,圣彼得堡和里约热内卢城市文本的重要调查奠定了基础,以供深入阅读。通过考虑巴赫金的言语体裁,对话和文学记时理论,以及西梅尔和本杰明,施瓦茨,托波罗夫和洛特曼等作家发展的文化符号学,我得出了同心和古怪的文化意识之间的区别。有意识地实现城市文本。我发现,现代主义小说的自我和作者焦虑特质的异化是通过对自我和城市的创造性的,病态的记忆而产生的同心叙事;而在偏心的叙事中则产生了将想象力用于城市位移和翻倍,离题的能力。和矛盾。在追求巴赫金所要求但未意识到的社会文体时,我反对巴赫金对地下叙事的解读,主张角落意识的创造能力。在洛特曼和施瓦茨所描绘的空间术语中,我将更充分地发展他和马里奥·德·安德拉德的复音叙事概念,并进入巴西和俄罗斯现代主义探索的室内空间。在我的导论和最后几章中,我们将思考这些离散的都市意识病理模型如何阐明贝利,巴雷托,普鲁斯特,伍尔夫和佩索阿的现代主义作品。我找到了一条倾斜的线,横切了二十世纪的俄罗斯和巴西巴西小说,这些作家是Lispector,Lins,Petrushevskaia和Makine等作家,这些小说的叙事是通过复杂的互文对话,政治逆转,文化流离失所和性意识进行的。我发现围绕,重新定义核心的怪异线以及“同心记忆”和“怪异疯狂”之间的交往能够将我们的小说重新记住和重新定位为我们时代的一种体裁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号