首页> 外文学位 >Cooperation and coercion: U.S. Strategies for coalition building in the First and Second Gulf Wars.
【24h】

Cooperation and coercion: U.S. Strategies for coalition building in the First and Second Gulf Wars.

机译:合作与强制:美国在第一次海湾战争和第二次海湾战争中建立联盟的战略。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation seeks to contribute to understanding the theories of military coalition formation. This U.S. foreign policy study will examine, compare, and contrast the formation of the First Gulf War (1991) and Second Gulf War (2003) coalitions to understand U.S. strategies in coalition building. This study will explain how and why U.S.-led coalition formation for the First Gulf War is different from the recent Iraq conflict. Specifically, the research question is how did U.S. military coalition strategies in the post-Cold War era change? By examining traditional military partnerships and alliances, economic incentives, and rhetoric by U.S. senior leaders (i.e., president and national security establishment), it will be shown how the strategy with which the U.S. forms coalitions changed.;The last eight years have seen the U.S. conduct its war on terror with mixed results. It has attempted to work with its allies and friends on an ad hoc basis using coalitions of the willing. However, unlike the strategy used in building the First Gulf War coalition, the legitimacy of recent coalitions has suffered from a lack of support from America's traditional allies and from the U.S. relying too much on its military dominance. The strategy used to build an international coalition for the Second Gulf War relied less on traditional allies and more on foreign assistance and fear-mongering rhetoric. The manner in which the U.S. builds coalitions now and in the future is an important research question to international relations. First, the current IR literature is woefully lacking in addressing military coalition formation. Second, this examination of coalition formation is important because the global war on terror will continue into the future. Finally, the examination of military coalition formation is important to the U.S. government, specifically to agencies such as the departments of state and defense. Acknowledging how coalitions have been formed could affect how traditional allies are approached, how future foreign assistance is used, and how rhetorical practices affect coalition building.
机译:本文旨在为理解军事同盟形成理论做出贡献。这项美国外交政策研究将研究,比较和对比第一次海湾战争(1991年)和第二次海湾战争(2003年)联盟的形成,以了解美国的联盟建设策略。这项研究将解释由美国领导的第一次海湾战争的组成以及与最近的伊拉克冲突有何不同。具体而言,研究问题是冷战后时期的美国军事联合战略是如何改变的?通过研究美国高级领导人(即总统和国家安全机构)的传统军事伙伴关系和同盟关系,经济激励措施和言论,将显示出美国组成联盟的战略是如何变化的;在过去八年中,美国进行反恐战争的结果好坏参半。它已尝试使用自愿联盟与它的盟友和朋友临时合作。但是,与建立第一次海湾战争联盟所采用的策略不同,最近的联盟的合法性遭受了美国传统盟友和美国过度依赖其军事统治地位的支持。建立第二次海湾战争国际联盟的战略较少依靠传统盟友,而是更多地依靠外国援助和散布恐惧的言论。美国现在和将来建立联盟的方式是对国际关系的重要研究问题。首先,目前的国际关系文献严重缺乏解决军事同盟的内容。第二,对联盟形成的审查很重要,因为全球反恐战争将持续到未来。最后,军事同盟形成的审查对美国政府,特别是对国务院和国防部等机构来说,至关重要。承认联盟的形成方式可能会影响与传统盟友的接触方式,未来的外国援助的使用方式以及修辞手法如何影响联盟的建立。

著录项

  • 作者

    MccCabe, Peter M.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of Florida.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Relations.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 266 p.
  • 总页数 266
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号