首页> 外文学位 >Hunanese nationalism and the revival of Wang Fuzhi, 1839--1923 (China, Mao Zedong).
【24h】

Hunanese nationalism and the revival of Wang Fuzhi, 1839--1923 (China, Mao Zedong).

机译:湖南民族主义与王夫之的复兴,1839--1923年(中国,毛泽东)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation paints a portrait of a forgotten nationalism in the south-central Chinese province of Hunan in the late 19th- and early 20th centuries. The author traces the movement's beginnings to the 1839 rediscovery of a Hunanese hermit scholar named Wang Fuzhi, whose idiosyncratic writings came to be seen as the local origins of otherwise Western ideas of progress, democracy, humanism and nationalism. The narrative follows three generations of Hunanese scholars who, as part of an ongoing effort to build a new provincial ethos to counter the widespread perception of Hunan as an intellectual backwater, transformed Wang Fuzhi into the iconic forefather of the modern "Hunanese spirit." Their scholarly revival gave rise to a localist movement bearing all of the markings of nationalism---including appeals to a common historical destiny, an insistence that Hunan's culture was different from the rest of China, bitter complaints of China's oppression of Hunan, and finally outright calls for independence---of which the young Mao Zedong in 1920 was one of the most strident voices.; Hunan had been firmly part of the Chinese empire since the Qin unification in the third century BC, and so---in contrast to peripheral provinces such as Taiwan, Xinjiang or Yunnan that were brought into China only by Qing expansion---it is the last place one expects to find strong voices of separatism. The depth of Hunanese patriotism depicted in this dissertation therefore calls into question the very foundations of modern Chinese nationalism---in particular the longstanding assumption that Confucian loyalty to the empire transformed naturally into a patriotic desire for a unified Chinese state. The case of Hunan shows that the Chinese nation's inheritance of the Qing empire was anything but natural or inevitable, and that scholars in the hinterland through the early 20th century did not necessarily consider "China" to be the object of their loyalty at all.
机译:本文描绘了十九世纪末至二十世纪初在中国中南部湖南省被遗忘的民族主义的画像。作者将这场运动的起源追溯到1839年重新发现了一位湖南隐士学者王夫之,他的特质著作被视为西方其他进步,民主,人本主义和民族主义思想的本地渊源。叙事遵循了三代湖南学者的思想,他们为建立新的省级精神以抵制人们普遍认为湖南是知识分子的死水而进行的努力的一部分,将王夫之变成了现代“湖南精神”的标志性前身。他们的学术复兴引发了带有所有民族主义标志的地方主义运动-包括呼吁共同的历史命运,坚称湖南的文化不同于中国其他地区,坚决抱怨中国压迫湖南,最后是彻底呼吁独立-1920年年轻的毛泽东是最强烈的声音之一。自公元前三世纪的秦统一以来,湖南一直是中华帝国的坚决一部分,因此-与台湾,新疆或云南等周边省份(仅通过清朝扩张而带入中国)形成鲜明对比-人们期望找到分裂主义的强烈声音的最后地方。因此,本文所描述的湖南爱国主义的深度使人们对现代中国民族主义的根基提出了质疑,尤其是长期以来的假设,即儒家对帝国的忠诚自然地转化为对统一中国国家的爱国渴望。以湖南为例,表明中华民族对清帝国的继承不是自然的或必然的,到20世纪初腹地的内地学者并不一定认为“中国”是其忠诚的对象。

著录项

  • 作者

    Platt, Stephen R.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 388 p.
  • 总页数 388
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号