首页> 外文学位 >Foreign policy analysis and the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy: Understanding the formal and informal decision-making processes.
【24h】

Foreign policy analysis and the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy: Understanding the formal and informal decision-making processes.

机译:外交政策分析和欧盟共同外交与安全政策:了解正式和非正式的决策过程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The EU Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) has witnessed important institutional developments since its creation in the 1991 Maastricht Treaty. These developments have led to increased coherence and visibility of the CFSP in certain regions of the world. Contrary to the belief that the CFSP is essentially conducted according to an intergovernmental decision-making process, the thesis shows how the creation of the post of the High Representative has led to a new system of governance in the field, with the Secretariat General of the Council of the EU at its core and the European Commission in a secondary but nevertheless crucial role. This second pillar system of governance is crucial in encouraging member-states to formulate and implement common positions. However, the dissertation also emphasizes the crucial role played by EU member-states in CFSP, as they are still the actors who need to initiate the process of "devolution" to the High Representative. In addition, the dissertation singles out the crucial role played by the United States in the second pillar, especially important when military issues are part of the process. The empirical analysis shows that when the issue is not contentious for transatlantic relations, the EU seems to act in a more unified way. To explain this new system of governance, the thesis uses foreign policy analysis (FPA) as the theoretical framework. It shows how this approach can be adapted from its state-centric focus to the study of the EU, by incorporating elements of the EU institutionalism literature in order to better grasp the specifics of the EU institutions.
机译:自1991年《马斯特里赫特条约》制定以来,欧盟共同外交与安全政策(CFSP)见证了重要的机构发展。这些发展使CFSP在世界某些地区的连贯性和知名度得以提高。与认为CFSP基本上是根据政府间决策程序进行的信念相反,本文表明,高级代表职位的设立是如何导致该领域的新管理体制的建立,而秘书长的秘书处欧盟理事会以其核心地位和欧洲委员会起着次要但至关重要的作用。治理的第二支柱体系对于鼓励成员国制定和执行共同立场至关重要。但是,论文还强调了欧盟成员国在CFSP中所起的关键作用,因为它们仍然是促使“下放”到高级代表进程的参与者。此外,论文还特别指出了美国在第二大支柱中所起的关键作用,尤其是在军事问题是进程的一部分的情况下。实证分析表明,当该问题不涉及跨大西洋关系时,欧盟似乎采取了更加统一的行动。为了解释这种新的治理体系,本文以外交政策分析(FPA)为理论框架。它展示了如何通过纳入欧盟制度主义文献的内容来更好地掌握欧盟机构的具体情况,从而将该方法从以国家为中心转向研究欧盟。

著录项

  • 作者

    Piana, Claire.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pittsburgh.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pittsburgh.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 235 p.
  • 总页数 235
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号