首页> 外文学位 >Learning and li: The Confucian process of humanization through ritual propriety.
【24h】

Learning and li: The Confucian process of humanization through ritual propriety.

机译:学与礼:儒家通过礼仪进行人性化的过程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Li, often translated as "ritual" or "ritual propriety," is among the most controversial notions of the Confucian philosophy. Its strong association with the Zhou tradition has caused it to be regarded with suspicion by both Western and Chinese representatives of modernity, mainly on the basis of the Enlightenment insistence of progressive rationality and liberation from the yoke of tradition. This work endeavors to offer a more balanced discussion of li by approaching it from the point of view of the Confucian view of learning or education. It offers a general philosophical discussion of the limitations of the critique of tradition and of rationality's claim to authority, leaning on several Western sources, notably Hans-Georg Gadamer, John Dewey and Pierre Bourdieu. Through an exposition of the ancient Chinese worldview of time and continuous change, it further points to the inevitability of li's adaptable and flexible nature. This underscores the argument, running through the work, that Confucius and his immediate followers did not endorse a program of returning to the Zhou tradition, but rather of reviving the "spirit" of the Zhou culture, involving active and personalized participation in tradition's sustention and evolution. An emphasis on li, therefore, is far from suggesting irrationality---such a view rather indicates the narrow definition of rationality as handed over from the Enlightenment "tradition." The difficulties with such a definition reveal themselves when trying to distinguish between education and indoctrination on a rational vs. irrational basis. The ancient Confucian philosophy of education and personal cultivation steers clear of these problems altogether while at the same time insisting on teaching methods that maximize the student's own initiative and personal realization. In this regard, li reveals itself as an indispensable pedagogical tool, both deepening students' understanding of the significance of their tradition, enabling them to realize their own contribution to its continuous unfolding and thereby providing them with a profound sense of meaning in their daily activities. The concluding chapter brings the issue to the present, and begins with a critical discussion of the prospects of li in the modern world. Lastly, it turns to the state of education both in the world at large and in the People's Republic of China, pointing out some problems for the development of effective education, but certainly some promising signs as well.
机译:李常被翻译成“礼仪”或“礼仪礼仪”,是儒家哲学中最具争议的概念之一。它与周氏传统的紧密联系使它受到西方和中国现代性代表的怀疑,主要是基于启蒙运动坚持渐进理性和从传统的the锁中解放出来的。这项工作旨在通过从儒家的学习或教育观点出发,对礼礼进行更均衡的讨论。它以西方的一些资料为依据,对传统批评和理性主张权威的局限性进行了一般性的哲学讨论,特别是汉斯-乔治·加达默尔,约翰·杜威和皮埃尔·布迪厄。通过阐述中国古代的时间观和不断变化的世界观,它进一步指出了李的适应性和灵活性的必然性。这强调了贯穿整个工作的论点,即孔子和他的直接追随者们并没有认可恢复周氏传统的计划,而是恢复了周氏文化的“精神”,涉及积极和个性化地参与传统的维持和发展。演化。因此,对li的强调远非暗示非理性-这种观点反而表明了从启蒙运动“传统”移交的理性的狭义定义。当试图在理性和非理性的基础上区分教育和灌输时,这种定义的困难就暴露出来了。古老的儒家教育和个人修养哲学完全避免了这些问题,同时坚持了最大限度地发挥学生的主动性和个人实现力的教学方法。在这方面,李秀英将自己展示为必不可少的教学工具,既加深了学生对传统意义的理解,也使他们能够意识到自己对传统的不断发展所做出的贡献,从而在日常活动中给他们以深刻的意义。 。最后一章将这个问题带到了现在,并从批判性地讨论锂在现代世界中的前景开始。最后,它谈到了全世界乃至整个中华人民共和国的教育状况,指出了发展有效教育的一些问题,但当然也有一些可喜的迹象。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sigurdsson, Geir.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Hawai'i.;

  • 授予单位 University of Hawai'i.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 239 p.
  • 总页数 239
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:13

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号