首页> 外文学位 >Symbolization and its discontents: An exploration of symbolic experience and poetic expression (Anne Sexton, Adrienne Rich).
【24h】

Symbolization and its discontents: An exploration of symbolic experience and poetic expression (Anne Sexton, Adrienne Rich).

机译:符号化及其不满:对符号体验和诗意表达的探索(安妮·塞克斯顿,阿德里安娜·里奇)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Symbolic capacity has been viewed as central to optimal development and psychological health. Disturbances in the capacity to form and use symbols has been discussed in psychoanalytic theory as one of the major symptoms of emotional disturbance. Object Relations Theory, including the work of Melanie Klein, D. W. Winnicott, Marion Milner, Hanna Segal, Wilfred Bion, and Ignacio Matte-Blanco, understands symbol formation as critical in the development of both the self and relationships with others. In this model, the use of symbols is a feature of the depressive position. French theorists Jacques Lacan and Julia Kristeva discuss language and the Symbolic as a fundamental aspect of subjectivity which at once constitutes the subject and alienates the subject from itself. This study explores a particular phenomenon in which the capacity to use symbols exists but does not help in the creation of subjectivity. Specifically, creativity is explored as a paradoxical experience which can be both psychologically useful yet also potentially damaging. Using the lives and work of poets Anne Sexton and Adrienne Rich, the author hypothesizes two different modes of symbolic experience which are termed the "alienated symbolic" and the "integrative symbolic." Using Winnicott's concept of transitional space, Ogden's concept of the "third" area of experience, and Kristeva's theory of the semiotic in language, the author argues that Rich is able, through the use of writing poetry and journals, to forge connection with others and establish a strong sense of self; on the other hand, Anne Sexton, whose capacity to form symbols was intact, used writing to evacuate unconscious material rather than integrate it. Thus, writing was alienating for her rather than integrative. The author analyzes aspects of each poet's life and work to illustrate her ideas. Textual analysis is also done exploring specific uses of metaphor, metonymy, and other poetic devices. Sexton's suicide is seen as the ultimate failure of writing for her, while Rich's political activism and vitality are understood as signs of the potential power of creative work.
机译:象征能力被视为实现最佳发展和心理健康的核心。精神分析理论已经讨论了形成和使用符号的能力障碍,这是情绪障碍的主要症状之一。对象关系理论,包括Melanie Klein,D。W. Winnicott,Marion Milner,Hanna Segal,Wilfred Bion和Ignacio Matte-Blanco的著作,都将符号的形成理解为自我和与他人关系发展的关键。在此模型中,符号的使用是压抑姿势的特征。法国理论家雅克·拉康(Jacques Lacan)和朱莉娅·克里斯蒂娃(Julia Kristeva)讨论了语言和象征作为主观性的基本方面,它立即构成了主题,并使主题脱离了自身。这项研究探讨了一种特殊的现象,其中存在使用符号的能力,但无助于创造主观性。具体来说,将创造力探索为一种悖论性的体验,既可以在心理上有用,也可以潜在地造成破坏。作者利用诗人安妮·塞克斯顿(Anne Sexton)和艾德丽安·里奇(Adrienne Rich)的生活和作品,假设了两种不同的象征体验模式,分别被称为“异化象征”和“综合象征”。利用温尼科特的过渡空间概念,奥格登的“第三体验”领域概念以及克里斯蒂娃的语言符号学理论,作者认为,里奇能够通过写作诗歌和期刊来与他人和其他人建立联系。建立强烈的自我意识;另一方面,安妮·塞克斯顿(Anne Sexton)完整地形成符号的能力,则使用写作来疏散无意识的材料,而不是整合它们。因此,写作对她而言是疏远而不是融合。作者分析了每位诗人的生活和工作方面,以阐明她的思想。文本分析也进行了探索,探讨了隐喻,转喻和其他诗意工具的具体用法。塞克斯顿(Sexton)的自杀被认为是为她写作的最终失败,而里奇(Rich)的政治积极性和活力被视为创造性工作潜在力量的标志。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fodaski, Kate S.;

  • 作者单位

    Adelphi University, The Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies.;

  • 授予单位 Adelphi University, The Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies.;
  • 学科 Psychology Clinical.; Literature American.; Biography.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 225 p.
  • 总页数 225
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医学心理学、病理心理学;传记;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号