首页> 外文学位 >A Study of the Accuracy of a Prototype Computer Numerical Control Dental Hand-piece Compared to Manual Preparation for a Full Coverage Crown Preparation.
【24h】

A Study of the Accuracy of a Prototype Computer Numerical Control Dental Hand-piece Compared to Manual Preparation for a Full Coverage Crown Preparation.

机译:与全覆盖牙冠制备的手动制备相比,原型计算机数控牙科手机的精度研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Aims and Hypothesis: The objective of this study was the design and testing of a Prototype Computer Numerical Control (CNC) dental handpiece. We predicted that the CNC Prototype would be more accurate than the human participant prosthodontists in clinical simulation.;Materials and Methods: A Prototype CNC dental handpiece was developed from off the shelf components, assigned 100 typodont teeth (;Results: RMSE Prototype (N=100) was 0.40mm. RMSE Prosthodontists (N=100) was 0.55mm. One sided T test, mean difference -.15mm (p<.001, one sided CI -.09). One Way ANOVA (F stat <1, F=.526, p=.717), Spearman correlation Prototype RMSE vs order(rho=.1, p=.334), RMSE vs Bur (rho=.36, p<.001); For each prosthodontist individually (N=20) RMSE vs Order Prosthodontist 4(rho=-.54, p= .015). Prosthodontist 5 (rho= .58, p = .022). Prosthodontist 3 (rho=.16, p=.498), Prosthodontist 2 (rho=-.07, p=.772), and Prosthodontist 1 (rho=-.08, p=.741) Spearman correlation (N=20) RMSE vs Bur Prosthodontist 5 (rho= .51, p = .007), Prosthodontist 2 (rho=.46, p= .040), Prosthodontist 4 (rho=-.07, p=.758), Prosthodontist 3 (rho=.18, p=.445), and Prosthodontist 1 (rho=.43, p=.059).;Conclusion: CNC Prototype achieved superior results in clinical simulation, attained on a modest budget with a modest level of research support. Work should continue on the next iteration of a prototype to address some of the limitations of movement, feedback, and emotional acceptance of a machine performing treatment from the perspective of a patient.
机译:目的和假设:这项研究的目的是设计和测试原型计算机数控(CNC)牙科手机。我们预测,在临床模拟中,CNC原型将比人类假牙修复师更为准确。;材料与方法:从现成的组件中开发出一种原型CNC牙科手机,并为其分配了100个台齿(;结果:RMSE原型(N = 100)是0.40mm.RMSE修复牙齿矫正专家(N = 100)是0.55mm。单面T检验,均差-.15mm(p <.001,单面CI -.09)。单向方差分析(F stat <1, F = .526,p = .717),Spearman相关原型RMSE vs顺序(rho = .1,p = .334),RMSE vs Bur(rho = .36,p <.001);对于每个牙齿修复专家(N = 20)RMSE与订购义齿修复师4(rho =-。54,p = .015)。义齿修复师5(rho = .58,p = .022)。义齿修复师3(rho = .16,p = .498),义齿修复师2(rho =-。07,p = .772)和Prosthodontist 1(rho =-。08,p = .741)Spearman相关(N = 20)RMSE与Bur Prosthodontist 5(rho = .51,p =。 007),修复牙齿修复师2(rho = .46,p = .040),修复牙齿修复师4(rho =-。07,p = .758),修复牙齿修复师3(rho = .18,p = .445)和修复牙齿修复师st 1(rho = .43,p = .059)。;结论:CNC原型在临床模拟中取得了优异的结果,这是通过适度的预算和适度的研究支持获得的。在原型的下一次迭代中,应继续进行工作,以从患者的角度解决执行治疗机器的运动,反馈和情感接受方面的一些限制。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bello, Nicholas G.;

  • 作者单位

    Tufts University School of Dental Medicine.;

  • 授予单位 Tufts University School of Dental Medicine.;
  • 学科 Dentistry.;Robotics.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 73 p.
  • 总页数 73
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号