首页> 外文学位 >Pushing a bi-national strategic alliance rope up a hill: An empirical assessment of how competing objectives can affect the actual outcome of a strategic alliance.
【24h】

Pushing a bi-national strategic alliance rope up a hill: An empirical assessment of how competing objectives can affect the actual outcome of a strategic alliance.

机译:将两国的战略联盟推上一个台阶:对竞争目标如何影响战略联盟实际结果的实证评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A qualitative historical case study of a recently established military strategic alliance, the Canada and United States Bi-national Planning Group (BPG), suggests that the actual outcome of a collaborative arrangement could end up being quite different from the stated/mandated goals and objectives, if there exits within the initiative a less obvious "hidden hand" top-level objective. Through application of a mixed methods approach, I was able to demonstrate how competing objectives could simultaneously exist within a strategic alliance, with the hidden one being the main driving force and purpose behind why and how a collaborative arrangement happened. Content analysis of the data revealed that the main determinate of success within a strategic alliance might not be the production of products per the obvious stated objectives, but rather the attainment of a less obvious higher-level geopolitical/geo-strategic goal. It is also argued that the existence of two competing objectives (one obvious and one hidden) within an alliance may directly affect a number of key activities such as team building, risk management, strategic planning, and large-scale change management. In addition, the existence of a hidden hand top-level objective can seriously jeopardize the building of trust within a strategic alliance and can lead to the emergence of confusion on what the goals, objectives, and desired end state really is. Ultimately, the task of making clear this less obvious top-level objective falls on the shoulders of the senior business leadership, because they are responsible for ensuring that trust building is not jeopardized, that the alliance does not end up struggling to perform, and that an atmosphere of confusion does not manifest itself (either internal or external to the organization). Finally, I offer implications for practice and future research. These projects could include the inclusion of Mexico into the currently established strategic alliance, and the development of a robust performance measurement tool.
机译:对最近建立的军事战略联盟加拿大和美国国家计划集团(BPG)进行的定性历史案例研究表明,合作安排的实际结果可能最终不同于既定/强制性目标,如果在计划内退出,则存在不太明显的“隐藏手”顶级目标。通过应用混合方法,我能够证明战略联盟中竞争目标如何同时存在,而隐藏的目标是协作安排为何以及如何发生的主要动力和目的。对数据的内容分析表明,战略联盟内成功的主要决定因素可能不是按照显而易见的既定目标生产产品,而是实现不太明显的更高层次的地缘政治/地缘战略目标。也有人认为,联盟中存在两个竞争目标(一个明显目标和一个隐藏目标)可能会直接影响许多关键活动,例如团队建设,风险管理,战略规划和大规模变更管理。此外,隐藏的顶级目标的存在会严重损害战略联盟内部的信任建立,并可能导致对目标,目的和所需最终状态的真正混淆。最终,澄清这个不太明显的高层目标的任务落在了高级业务领导的肩上,因为他们负责确保不损害建立信任,确保联盟最终不会为执行而奋斗,并且混乱的气氛不会显现出来(在组织内部或外部)。最后,我提供了对实践和未来研究的启示。这些项目可能包括将墨西哥纳入当前建立的战略联盟,以及开发强大的绩效评估工具。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stancati, Bernard.;

  • 作者单位

    Colorado Technical University.;

  • 授予单位 Colorado Technical University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.; Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 D.M.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 521 p.
  • 总页数 521
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号