首页> 外文学位 >Bench scale evaluation of two enhanced digestion processes: Enhanced enzymic hydrolysis and acid-gas phased digestion.
【24h】

Bench scale evaluation of two enhanced digestion processes: Enhanced enzymic hydrolysis and acid-gas phased digestion.

机译:两种增强的消化过程的基准规模评估:增强的酶水解和酸气相消化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The overall objective of this research was to make a comparative evaluation of two enhanced digestion processes for digestion of thickened municipal sludge from Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment plant. The digestion processes studied were Enhanced Enzymic Hydrolysis (Process I) and Acid-Gas Phased digestion (Process II). Both of these processes are two-phase digestion processes. A Conventional Mesophilic digestion process was maintained as the control process. The performances of the processes were studied in terms of volatile solids reduction, pathogen destruction and biogas production. Process I achieved 53.2% volatile solids reduction, compared to 51.7% for the Process II and 49.6% for the Control process. The final effluent from Process I and Process II met the 40 CFR Part 503 standards for fecal coliform reduction requirement for Class A Biosolids, while the effluent of Control process failed to do so, when standard culturing method was used. The specific gas production (ft3/lb VS destroyed) was 16.34 for Process I, 17.48 for Process II and 17.30 for the Control and these values are well within the typical range of 12-18 (ft3/lb VS destroyed) for the anaerobic digestion processes. The average methane content of Process I and Process II mesophilic reactors, and Control reactor were 69.3%, 69.4% and 60%, respectively.;The average values of COD reduction were 53.0% for Process I, 51.3% for Process II and 53.4% for Control Process. During the study period, no ammonia inhibition was observed in any of the processes and average free ammonia concentrations were 73 mg/L and 70 mg/L for the final steps of Process I and Process II, respectively. In Control Process, average free ammonia concentration was 77 mg/L. The monthly average VFA levels as acetic acid (HAc) were 9000 mg/L and 3096 mg/L for the pretreatment steps of Process I and Process II, respectively. The mesophilic stages acted as the polishing steps where VFA levels were reduced to 121 mg/L for Process I and 603 mg/L for process II. The average VFA level in the Control was 217.8 mg/L.
机译:这项研究的总体目标是对两种改进的消化工艺进行比较评估,这些工艺用于消化来自Blue Plains高级废水处理厂的增稠城市污泥。研究的消化过程为增强酶水解(过程I)和酸气相消化(过程II)。这两个过程都是两阶段的消化过程。保持常规的嗜温消化过程作为控制过程。从挥发性固体减少,病原体破坏和沼气产生方面研究了该工艺的性能。方法I实现了53.2%的挥发性固体减少,而方法II和对照方法分别为51.7%和49.6%。过程I和过程II的最终流出物符合40 CFR第503部分关于A类生物固体粪便大肠菌群减少要求的标准,而使用标准培养方法时,对照过程的流出物没有达到此标准。工艺I的比气产量(ft3 / lb VS被破坏)为16.34,工艺II为17.48,对照为17.30,这些值完全在厌氧消化的12-18(ft3 / lb VS被破坏)的典型范围内流程。过程I和过程II中温反应器和对照反应器的平均甲烷含量分别为69.3%,69.4%和60%.;过程I的COD降低平均值分别为53.0%,过程II的51.3%和53.4%用于控制过程。在研究期间,在任何工艺中均未观察到氨的抑制作用,工艺I和工艺II的最终步骤的平均游离氨浓度分别为73 mg / L和70 mg / L。在对照过程中,平均游离氨浓度为77 mg / L。对于方法I和方法II的预处理步骤,月平均VFA乙酸水平(HAc)为9000 mg / L和3096 mg / L。中温阶段充当抛光步骤,其中工艺I的VFA含量降至121 mg / L,工艺II的VFA含量降至603 mg / L。对照组中的VFA平均水平为217.8 mg / L。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ahmed, Farid.;

  • 作者单位

    The George Washington University.;

  • 授予单位 The George Washington University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Environmental.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 120 p.
  • 总页数 120
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号