首页> 外文学位 >The aesthetics of ethical subjectivity: Ethics and aesthetics in the work of Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche and Theodor Adorno.
【24h】

The aesthetics of ethical subjectivity: Ethics and aesthetics in the work of Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche and Theodor Adorno.

机译:伦理主体性美学:伊曼纽尔·康德,弗里德里希·尼采和西奥多·阿多诺的著作中的伦理和美学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This project examines the effect that aesthetic reflection can have on the formation of ethical subjects and the development of reciprocal relations between individuals. In particular, it investigates whether aesthetic judgement, precisely because it encourages the development of a critically self-reflexive subject, provides a valuable model for ethics.; The groundwork for this investigation is laid by Immanuel Kant who depicts the individual as an autonomous, rational agent that is capable of, and indeed responsible for, determining his or her own judgement. Kant's insight regarding the autonomy of the subject enables him to create a system of ethics that is upheld by imperatives, which he argues command respect because they are universally valid for all rational beings.; Friedrich Nietzsche and Theodor Adorno build upon Kant's claim concerning the subject's autonomy to put forward two very different interpretations of what it means to be or become an ethical subject. Nietzsche encourages individuals to create or shape their identity as highly individualised, dynamic subjects akin to living works of art, rather than universalised and disembodied subjects. Nietzsche's emphasis on the subject's flourishing and growth provides important insights into the formation of oneself as an ethical subject, but it provides little in terms of recognising and developing reciprocal, ethical relations with others.; Theodor Adorno's dialectical approach, on the other hand, interprets the subject as intersubjectively developed, which acknowledges the importance of reciprocal relations with others. Adorno's constant reference to the generic subject and object, however, does not differentiate between various types of subjects and objects and their relationships and in so doing, threatens to negate the agency of individuals. In order for Adorno's approach to be a viable means through which ethical subjectivity can be formulated, it needs to be able to acknowledge that ethical interaction occurs between socially embedded individuals because it is through these relationships that individuals can be challenged and exercise their agency as ethical subjects.
机译:该项目研究了审美反思对道德主体的形成和个人之间相互关系的发展可能产生的影响。尤其是,它研究的审美判断是否恰恰是因为它鼓励发展批判性的自我反省的学科,从而为道德提供了有价值的模型。这项调查的基础是伊曼纽尔·康德(Immanuel Kant)奠定的,他将个人描述为一个有能力并且确实有责任确定自己的判断力的自治的,理性的代理人。康德对主体自治的洞察力使他能够建立一套必须遵守的道德规范体系,他认为这是命令性的,因为它们对所有理性人都是普遍有效的。弗里德里希·尼采(Friedrich Nietzsche)和西奥多·阿多诺(Theodor Adorno)以康德关于该科目自治的主张为基础,对成为或成为道德科目意味着什么提出了两种截然不同的解释。尼采鼓励个人创造或塑造自己的身份,使其成为与生活中的艺术品相似的高度个性化,充满活力的主题,而不是普遍化和无体现的主题。尼采对这一学科蓬勃发展的重视为人们对自己作为一个道德学科的形成提供了重要的见解,但在承认和发展与他人的互惠,道德关系方面几乎没有提供。另一方面,西奥多·阿多诺(Theodor Adorno)的辩证法将这一主题解释为主体间发展的主题,这认识到与他人建立相互关系的重要性。但是,阿多诺(Adorno)对通用主题和客体的不断提及并未在各种类型的主题和客体及其关系之间进行区分,从而威胁到否定个人的代理权。为了使Adorno的方法成为一种可行的手段来制定道德主观性,它必须能够认识到社会根植的个体之间会发生道德互动,因为通过这些关系,个体可以受到挑战并行使其道德准则科目。

著录项

  • 作者

    Juric, Tanja Mirjana.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 156 p.
  • 总页数 156
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号