首页> 外文学位 >Seismic Earth Pressures on Retaining Structures and Basement Walls in Cohesionless Soils.
【24h】

Seismic Earth Pressures on Retaining Structures and Basement Walls in Cohesionless Soils.

机译:无粘性土壤中挡土结构和地下室墙的地震土压力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Observations of the performance of basement walls and retaining structures in recent earthquakes show that failures of basement or deep excavation walls in earthquakes are rare even if the structures were not designed for the actual magnitude of the earthquake loading. Failures of retaining structures are most commonly confined to waterfront structures retaining saturated backfill with liquefaction being the critical factor in the failures. Failures of other types of retaining structures are relatively rare and usually involve a more complex set of conditions, such as sloping ground either above or below the retaining structure, or both. While some failures have been observed, there is no evidence of a systemic problem with traditional static retaining wall design even under quite severe loading conditions. No significant damage or failures of retaining structures occurred in the recent earthquakes such as Wenchuan earthquake in China (200) and, or subduction zone generated earthquakes in Chile (2010) and Japan (2011). Therefore, this experimental and analytical study was undertaken to develop a better understanding of the distribution and magnitude of seismic earth pressures on cantilever retaining structures.;The experimental component of the study consists of two sets of dynamic centrifuge model experiments. In the first experiment two model structures representing basement type setting were used, while in the second test a U-shaped channel with cantilever sides and a simple cantilever wall were studied. All of these structures were chosen to be representative of typical designs. Dry medium-dense sand with relative density on the order of from 75% to 80% was used as backfill. Results obtained from the centrifuge experiments were subsequently used to develop and calibrate a two-dimensional, nonlinear, finite difference model built on the FLAC platform.;The centrifuge data consistently shows that for the height of structures considered herein, i.e. in the range of 20-30 ft, the maximum dynamic earth pressure increases with depth and can be reasonably approximated by a triangular distribution This suggests that the point of application of the resultant force of the dynamic earth pressure increment is approximately 1/3H above the base of the wall as opposed to 0.5-0.6 H recommended by most current design procedures. In general, the magnitude of the observed seismic earth pressures depends on the magnitude and intensity of shaking, the density of the backfill soil, and the type of the retaining structures. The computed values of seismic earth pressure coefficient (ΔKae) back calculated from the centrifuge data at the time of maximum dynamic wall moment suggest that for free standing cantilever retaining structures seismic earth pressures can be neglected at accelerations below 0.4 g. While similar conclusions and recommendations were made by Seed and Whitman (1970), their approach assumed that a wall designed to a reasonable static factor of safety should be able to resist seismic loads up 0.3 g. In the present study, experimental data suggest that seismic loads up to 0.4 g could be resisted by cantilever walls designed to an adequate factor of safety. This observation is consistent with the observations and analyses performed by Clough and Fragaszy (1977) and Fragaszy and Clough (1980) and Al-Atik and Sitar (2010) who concluded that conventionally designed cantilever walls with granular backfill could be reasonably expected to resist seismic loads at accelerations up to 0.4 g.;Finally, numerical models using FLAC finite difference code were quite successful and able to produce a reasonably good agreement with the results of the centrifuge experiments. However, while the finite difference models were able to capture the main aspects of the seismic response observed in the centrifuge experiments, the results of the analyses were highly sensitive to the selection of soil and interface parameters. Therefore, numerical models used for future designs should be carefully calibrated against experimental data in order to provide reliable results.
机译:对最近地震中地下室墙和保持结构的性能的观察表明,即使地震结构中的地下室或深基坑墙不是为地震荷载的实际大小设计的,也很少发生这种情况。挡土结构的破坏最常见的是限于保留饱和回填的滨水结构,而液化是破坏的关键因素。其他类型的固定结构的故障相对较少,通常会遇到一系列更复杂的情况,例如固定结构上方或下方的倾斜地面,或两者兼而有之。尽管已经观察到一些故障,但没有证据表明即使在相当恶劣的负载条件下,传统的静态挡土墙设计也存在系统性问题。在最近的地震中,例如中国的汶川地震(200人)和智利(2010年)和日本(2011年)的俯冲带引发的地震,没有发生大的破坏或破坏。因此,进行该实验和分析研究是为了更好地理解悬臂式保持结构上地震土压力的分布和大小。研究的实验部分包括两组动态离心模型实验。在第一个实验中,使用了两个表示地下室类型设置的模型结构,而在第二个测试中,研究了具有悬臂侧面和简单悬臂壁的U形通道。选择所有这些结构来代表典型设计。相对密度在75%至80%左右的干燥中密度沙子用作回填。随后将离心机实验获得的结果用于开发和校准基于FLAC平台的二维,非线性,有限差分模型。离心机数​​据始终显示本文考虑的结构高度,即在20范围内在-30英尺时,最大动土压力会随深度而增加,并且可以通过三角分布合理地近似。这表明,动土压力增量的合力的施加点大约为墙体底部的1 / 3H。相对于大多数当前设计程序建议的0.5-0.6H。通常,观测到的地震土压力的大小取决于振动的大小和强度,回填土的密度以及保持结构的类型。在最大动态壁矩时刻从离心机数据反算得到的地震土压力系数(ΔKae)的计算值表明,对于独立式悬臂式保持结构,加速度低于0.4 g时可以忽略地震土压力。尽管Seed和Whitman(1970)提出了类似的结论和建议,但他们的方法假设设计成具有合理静态安全系数的墙应能够抵抗0.3 g的地震荷载。在本研究中,实验数据表明,设计成足够安全系数的悬臂墙可以抵抗高达0.4 g的地震荷载。该观察结果与Clough和Fragaszy(1977)以及Fragaszy和Clough(1980)以及Al-Atik和Sitar(2010)进行的观察和分析相一致,他们得出的结论是,传统设计的带有颗粒回填的悬臂墙可以合理地抵抗地震。最后,使用FLAC有限差分代码的数值模型非常成功,并且能够与离心机实验的结果产生相当好的一致性。但是,虽然有限差分模型能够捕获离心机实验中观察到的地震响应的主要方面,但分析结果对土壤和界面参数的选择高度敏感。因此,应针对实验数据仔细校准用于未来设计的数值模型,以提供可靠的结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Geraili Mikola, Roozbeh.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Engineering General.;Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 185 p.
  • 总页数 185
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号